• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ashwin vs Jadeja

Who deserves more to be in an Indian ATG XI?


  • Total voters
    15

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
He wasn't really dropped though? I would say he was rotated around like MacGill in his career at times, especially post 2020 because of India picking more seamers and Shardul Thakur having a mini career. I don't see that as a big negative, it would've happened to any other Indian spinner you 'like' in this discussion because of the circumstances, including Kumble.
Rotation requires being dropped from games
 

Xix2565

International Vice-Captain
Nobody asked you but anyways rating Kumble higher doesn't make me anti-India. I've been accused just a couple of days ago of being an Indian nationalist in this forum.


Obviously meant we discard WI and SL.
The person who did so must've been confused for a second by your brief moment of intelligence. Let them be disabused of this notion from now on.

You didn't say that though, so too bad.

Ashwin and Jadeja genuinely bamboozled batsmen through their bowling on helpful pitches. Kumble was more like Kapil in the sense everyone around him were bad and he was the only quality bowler. So, he just got loads of wickets through sheer volume and being a quality bowler. Less said about his batting and fielding the better it is. There has been countless times in my childhood that Sachin had played a great knock and India lost the matches due to the terrible bowlers. Thankfully, it is not the case now after Ash-Jaddu came in.
I mean if we're talking about home pitches Jadeja was a bigger standout than Ashwin/Kumble, though you can always argue about what pitches they played on. Away from home I don't disagree, Kumble generally was forced to bowl a lot because of a lack of pace options in SENA, compared to Ashwin/Jadeja who did get a proper pace attack with them from about 2016 onwards.

I mean even now in the latest England tour, Jadeja/Washington didn't bowl a lot anyway because of the perceived effectiveness of the pacers, and I'd say they're not much better than what Kumble bowled with bar Bumrah.
 

CricAddict

International Coach
I think I am the biggest Tendulkar fan on this site.

Please accept that my views are genuine assessments from my part.
Glad to know you are a Tendulkar fan. Biggest fan is contentious though with me also being in this forum.

Yeah I accept that your views are genuine from your pov but you don't accept when people explain you the logic of why you are wrong in some cases. Most people don't accept that they are wrong (Flower's keeping for me a case in point) but you never do which riles people.

Back to the topic, Imo Ashwin and Jadeja are so obviously better than Kumble and easily get into India atg XI over him with bowling being equal, batting and fielding far above. I dont think Kumble or any other spinner would have fared much better than Ash-Jaddu in the pitches they got away from home but you are never going to accept that point. There is a reason why most India opposition went with 4 pacers and no spinner at their home. And India too sometimes dropped both Ash-Jaddu on those pitches.

You bringing up percentage of matches played away for Kumble vis-a-vis Ashwin and Jadeja is such a lame point when his competition is Harbhajan Singh and pitch rigging was also not so blatant those days. Both you and I know that it is not a fair point.
 

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Glad to know you are a Tendulkar fan. Biggest fan is contentious though with me also being in this forum.

Yeah I accept that your views are genuine from your pov but you don't accept when people explain you the logic of why you are wrong in some cases. Most people don't accept that they are wrong (Flower's keeping for me a case in point) but you never do which riles people.
If you accept my views are genuine then don't claim I have some agenda on Jadeja or Ashwin.

I have revised my opinions. For examples, Kallis bowling recently when I was being accused of being anti Kallis. I also upgraded Jadejas batting rating and I now consider him more of a lock in an Indian ATG XI over Ashwin, based on your arguments to me.

I'm not as inflexible as you think I am.
 

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
So, you agree Kumble wasn't effective on unhelpful pitches at home. But you take away points for Ash-Jaddu when they are not effective on unhelpful pitches away.
Kumble was more effective away on unhelpful pitches.

Kumble was just as effective on home helpful pitches.

Ash Jadeja didn't really play much on home unhelpful pitches over a stretch of time, not counting the odd series.
 

CricAddict

International Coach
If you accept my views are genuine then don't claim I have some agenda on Jadeja or Ashwin.

I have revised my opinions. For examples, Kallis bowling recently when I was being accused of being anti Kallis. I also upgraded Jadejas batting rating and I now consider him more of a lock in an Indian ATG XI over Ashwin, based on your arguments to me.

I'm not as inflexible as you think I am.
One can be having genuine views and also have an agenda. Happens when that view strongly perceives something and so an agenda is set forth to prove that view right. Everyone does that. So I don't think it is bad.

Good to know that you lock Jadeja over Ashwin in the Indian XI.
 

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
That doesn't mean it helped them either? Lower sample size can distort quality both ways you know.
Sure but you brought average into, hence this argument comes up since Kumble would be more effected. And pitches in his time were so much flatter home and away.
 

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Good to know that you lock Jadeja over Ashwin in the Indian XI.
Dude when you explained to me, I realised that Jadejas batting has clearly overcome their bowling difference by now.

That's my entire rationale for this thread, seeing if others agree that Jadeja is ahead of Ashwin for this side. Not some agenda.
 

Xix2565

International Vice-Captain
Sure but you brought average into, hence this argument comes up since Kumble would be more effected. And pitches in his time were so much flatter home and away.
Again, it could've gone either way still. The home pitches weren't much flatter for Kumble, and the 'away' (for you) pitches were a lot better for fast bowling when Ashwin/Jadeja played than they were for Kumble.
 

Xix2565

International Vice-Captain
Dude when you explained to me, I realised that Jadejas batting has clearly overcome their bowling difference by now.

That's my entire rationale for this thread, seeing if others agree that Jadeja is ahead of Ashwin for this side. Not some agenda.
You shouldn't pretend like this isn't an agenda either though. Makes you even more dishonest when you cite such threads in other discussions.
 

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Again, it could've gone either way still. The home pitches weren't much flatter for Kumble, and the 'away' (for you) pitches were a lot better for fast bowling when Ashwin/Jadeja played than they were for Kumble.
Hone and away pitches in Kumbles 2000 time were flatter for everyone
 

Top