MasterBlaster24
U19 Cricketer
Better test batter?
@capt_Luffy Do not greenlight Flower ~ KohliFlower is more comparable with Kohli than Pujara now
Flower ~ Kohli (without any hate)@capt_Luffy Do not greenlight Flower ~ Kohli
Look virat record vs aus eng sa and look at kane. Love kane but he is a htb and has done nothing in ind eng sa and slThis is as bad as Williamson v Virat lol.
Come to think of it, Virat v Pujara is a decent discussion when one accounts for the extra value facing more deliveries provides. @PlayerComparisons what are your thoughts? Worth a thread?
Flower is more comparable with Kohli than Pujara now
Flower's avg in Eng-22This is as bad as Williamson v Virat lol.
Come to think of it, Virat v Pujara is a decent discussion when one accounts for the extra value facing more deliveries provides. @PlayerComparisons what are your thoughts? Worth a thread?
Flower easily as a batsman. It's a bit closer if you consider keeping.Flower easily.
I'm not saying he isn't comparable. I'm saying he is closer to Kohli than he is to Pujara. A big part of that is because Kohli isn't that far from Pujara now as he used to be before this massive decline.Flower's avg in Eng-22
Pak-38
Sa-26
Sl-23
Ban-142
Flower scored heavily on flat tracks in India.
(avg runs per wkt in games that Flower played in India - 42.33)
Flower had a great series in 2000s in the west indies, and I'll give him credit for that. Pujara's heroics in Australia are equal to or even better than that, imo. (best opponent of his era)
Flower didn't play a single match in Australia. (not his fault btw)
But only played a single match against Australia (best opposition of his era) which massively benefitted his overall record.
Flower batted mostly at 5.
Pujara batted mostly at 3.(opened in some games too)
Because Flower carried a minnow team, I also rate him slightly higher than Pujara as a batter.
How is Flower not comparable to Pujara?
Flower isn't Tendulkar, who cannot be compared to Pujara. I honestly disagree with your opinion that Pujara is a tier below batter than Flower, though.
Avgs of some Zimbabwean batters from Flowers debut to 1999 Dec 31I'm not saying he isn't comparable. I'm saying he is closer to Kohli than he is to Pujara. A big part of that is because Kohli isn't that far from Pujara now as he used to be before this massive decline.
Now for their comparison, Flower did bat at 5 but his team's batting was pretty poor, so his entry points were comparable to no 4's of most top team s (even worse in some cases). I agree with the point of Pujara's heroics against AUS, and against SL too he did very well, albeit it was a very weak outfit, but against the other sides like SA, ENG, NZ and even WI his record is very poor (both home and away), hence why I have Flower above.
PS: The Kohli statement was meant to be more an indictment on Kohli rather than Pujara.
Houghton and Goodwin played like 20 games with Flower and Grant's average ended up as 28Avgs of some Zimbabwean batters from Flowers debut to 1999 Dec 31
A Flower-44.48
DL Houghton-43.05
MW Goodwin-40.22
GW Flower-33.28
Flower wasn't lone warrior either.
He only had a good record in New Zealand out of all the Sena nations. In the second half of the 1990s, NZ was a poor team.How can someone who hasn't shown themselves in Sena countries be given such a high rating? When Pujara was playing, West Indies was a poor team.
In SA and Eng, Pujara at least scored a couple of centuries.
Pujara averaged in the late 40s after playing the same amount of years as Flower.
How can someone who hasn't shown themselves in Sena countries be given such a high rating?Houghton and Goodwin played like 20 games with Flower and Grant's average ended up as 28