• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Andy Flower vs Adam Gilchrist vs Les Ames

Andy Flower vs Adam Gilchrist vs Les Ames (Test batting only)


  • Total voters
    27

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Gilly was an attacking batter down at 7 for all his Test career. He had a very position specific role he carved out for himself. It would seem de kock was pretty damn good when doing that position specific role too.
Given he averages 38 overall would mean he was pretty **** when not performing that position specific role as well.
 

shortpitched713

Cricketer Of The Year
Gilchrist having more impact on his team than Flower is a very poorly thought out joke. He batted at 7 behind one of the strongest sides Ever, unlike Flower who carried his team on his back.
Hmm, I'll grant you that on the impact side. But Gilchrist is the better of the 2. His attacking style did the best to maximize, given his position, so we shouldn't overlook him based on that position alone.
 

Top