kyear2
Hall of Fame Member
From what I've heard and read, it was more than slightly. But all subjectiveAnd by most accounts, he sounds the slightly better pure keeper
From what I've heard and read, it was more than slightly. But all subjectiveAnd by most accounts, he sounds the slightly better pure keeper
NGL, the ultimate insultHas Migara taken over this account or something?
To be very clear and not allow the bs takes.Kyear went on a rant about how a better cricketer should always make an ATG XI and then voted that second for Wasim whom he rates less than Imran.
Who is this Kyear3 voter btw?
Personally disagree.Quality doesn't overcome a lack of quality.
No you are assuming what a no.3 greatest cricketer HAS to be like.To be very clear and not allow the bs takes.
I said if you're claiming someone is the 3rd greatest cricketer of all time, there's no way to justify not making an AT team. We aren't talking 8th where personal preferences may step in...
If someone is the definitive best cricketer behind Bradman and Sobers, as many here claim him to be, he walks into these teams as easily as the other two.
Who is arguing that? We are arguing for a better bowling attack. The second ATG XI has a more rounded and effective attack than the first.There's this ridiculous logic that somehow the bowling all rounder Imran makes up for not having an additional specialist batsman, when the other team is stacked down to no. 7...
Quality doesn't overcome a lack of quality.
It's definitely not him you dumbass.No idea honestly. The posting style looked similar to a certain someone, but they denied it and I definitely believe them.
I count the votes from Amit and Kyear3 though, and Miller still wins without that voteThat obviously shouldn't count. Doesn't influence the result, but it's obvious why it shouldn't count.
Don't vote for pre Golden age players. Make a pre golden age squad and non capped squad separately at the end.Kumar Sangakkara
WG Grace
Dale Steyn
Wasim Akram
Bill O'Reilly
Steyn over Barnes would've made this attack even better imo. Just perfect variety of styles that compliment each other.Miller made it. Awesome! We officially have a superior bowling attack to the first ATG XI.
Ambrose - Tall, miserly
Barnes - Mystery seam spin
Imran - Reverse and inswing master
Miller - Sharp and fast conventional swing
Murali - Most dangerous spinner ever
Compare this to the first XI. It's simply better on pace friendly tracks, better on flat tracks and better on spinning surfaces.
Go with Sangakkara. Better batsman (definitely ATG) over career and kept to Murali in close to 50 Tests. Can't beat that up. Warne-Gilly in the first and Murali-Sanga in the 2nd is some nice development as well. Walcott and Sangakkara fighting might just let Knott to sneak aheadMiller made it. Awesome! We officially have a superior bowling attack to the first ATG XI.
Ambrose - Tall, miserly
Barnes - Mystery seam spin
Imran - Reverse and inswing master
Miller - Sharp and fast conventional swing
Murali - Most dangerous spinner ever
Compare this to the first XI. It's simply better on pace friendly tracks, better on flat tracks and better on spinning surfaces.
Totally agree. It's the logical choice. I'd have picked Knott usually, but this team needs more batting.Go with Sangakkara. Better batsman (definitely ATG) over career and kept to Murali in close to 50 Tests.
I get that. But I am fine with a wildcard in BarnesSteyn over Barnes would've made this attack even better imo. Just perfect variety of styles that compliment each other.