• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

All-Time World XIs: Discussion Thread

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Not in this case. This team has great balance with either Kallis or Miller.

Fair, but worth it. With the quality of this lineup, you are very seldom going to need huge scores. Rather have him shepherding the tail and making sure of very few lowish scores than getting the occasional huge score on the back of him going very big.
Lara at 4 breaks up the run of right handers and as pointed out, has the greater propensity for mammoth scores.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
If we do something like 30 ATG XIs, I think we can get there eventually.
Or if we re run this exercise in like 5 years or something using this thread again
I think voting will plummet significantly post team D or E, people lose interest quite easily after a few teams. Also, think we should do 27 teams.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
I honestly don't think there will be much difference in output with Kallis or Sangakkara at 6 (given he keeps)
I think it's silly to think that Sangakkara keeping wouldn't significantly damage his run output. Samplesizelol but it's worth noting that in the 13 tests from 2000–06 in which he didn't keep he averaged 68, as opposed to 41 when keeping.
 

Top