capt_Luffy
Hall of Fame Member
Do they though??Have to be Knott regardless.
Watling and Healy plus others need to be picked before those other keepers
Do they though??Have to be Knott regardless.
Watling and Healy plus others need to be picked before those other keepers
Ah well as usual appeal to consensus when it suits you, a classic Kyear tactic.If you're in the 2nd team, you're not the 3rd best cricketer.
Lara at 4 breaks up the run of right handers and as pointed out, has the greater propensity for mammoth scores.Not in this case. This team has great balance with either Kallis or Miller.
Fair, but worth it. With the quality of this lineup, you are very seldom going to need huge scores. Rather have him shepherding the tail and making sure of very few lowish scores than getting the occasional huge score on the back of him going very big.
It gets really really interesting from the next team onwards.... Reckon there will be many more disagreements than there have been so farDo they though??
I won't though because I am pretty clear I don't find CW consensus as authoritative.Well, Subs will say something about Barry in the same tone when he doesn't get in the 5th or 6th team.
I think voting will plummet significantly post team D or E, people lose interest quite easily after a few teams. Also, think we should do 27 teams.If we do something like 30 ATG XIs, I think we can get there eventually.
Or if we re run this exercise in like 5 years or something using this thread again
Kallis doesn't make any sense at 6. It's two positions from his usual one and his average drops precipitously down the order.Lara at 4 breaks up the run of right handers and as pointed out, has the greater propensity for mammoth scores.
Kept to Underwood in the stickies. And if you want a Murali specialist, just get Sangakkara in.How good was Alan Kott when keeping to spinners? Ian Healy was excellent keeping to Warne so must be fine while keeping to Murali.
Yeah what if the three best cricketers on Mars are wily spinners on their dusty grounds? I don't think they'd all be selected for tests on Earth.You absolutely can be
I honestly don't think there will be much difference in output with Kallis or Sangakkara at 6 (given he keeps)Kallis doesn't make any sense at 6. It's two positions from his usual one and his average drops precipitously down the order.
Makes senseI think voting will plummet significantly post team D or E, people lose interest quite easily after a few teams. Also, think we should do 27 teams.
Knott kept to Underwood on stickies.How good was Alan Kott when keeping to spinners? Ian Healy was excellent keeping to Warne so must be fine while keeping to Murali.
If we do get near the record though, I suggest we do not take the Mulder approachI think voting will plummet significantly post team D or E, people lose interest quite easily after a few teams. Also, think we should do 27 teams.
I still get unreasonably mad thinking about that.If we do get near the record though, I suggest we do not take the Mulder approach though
Bumrah gonna fire today. Be happy.I still get unreasonably mad thinking about that.
I think it's silly to think that Sangakkara keeping wouldn't significantly damage his run output. Samplesizelol but it's worth noting that in the 13 tests from 2000–06 in which he didn't keep he averaged 68, as opposed to 41 when keeping.I honestly don't think there will be much difference in output with Kallis or Sangakkara at 6 (given he keeps)
Stop jinxing itBumrah gonna fire today. Be happy.
When Hadlee, while competing for the same spot basically laps him?You absolutely can be