A complete waste of space at the moment. At this rate I'd rather play Nitish Kumar Reddy, who performed in the BGT and is a fresher face with loads of potential.Whatever happens from here, one has to wonder why Shardul Thakur is in India's XI.
Selectors and team failed to recognize Shardul as the fluke he was and got duped into a false sense of security for SENA tours thinking they had a readymade seamer-allrounder they could call upon when the time came.A complete waste of space at the moment. At this rate I'd rather play Nitish Kumar Reddy, who performed in the BGT and is a fresher face with loads of potential.
True.Indian bowling attack is so badat chasingnow that this doesn’t even register as that remarkable a win.
Don't joke about 2014!Get Ishant in to bowl a few bumpers and hope they self implode like 2014 Lords imo
Throwing it away sounds more probable than a double ton to me.Great knock from Duckett, this. Could end unbeaten with Greenidge-esque double ton, don't really see how we get him out unless he just throws it away.
Bhuvi WAFG. Vital runs in both innings and a 6-fer. How on earth did Ishant rob MotM ffs.Don't joke about 2014!
![]()
Full Scorecard of India vs England 2nd Investec Test 2014 - Score Report | ESPNcricinfo.com
Complete Scorecard of India vs England 2nd Investec Test 2014, India tour of England only on ESPNcricinfo.com. Find the complete scorecard of India vs England 2nd Investec Test Onlinewww.espncricinfo.com
Bhuvi, Shami, Jadeja (obviously better 10 years ago!) and Ishant along with erm Dhawan and Vijay bowling!
Better all round bowling line up than this one man mob.
There is not only what selectors think, also what the captain makes of it. If Gill is not going to use him, why pick him? Not sure if the comparison is right, but reminds me of Dhoni not using Stuart Binny.Selectors and team failed to recognize Shardul as the fluke he was and got duped into a false sense of security for SENA tours thinking they had a readymade seamer-allrounder they could call upon when the time came.
I dont really agree. He played really really well in Ranji and looked pretty good in the IPL. The thing is, if you pick him, you give him the best chance of success at the role he is picked for, which is a bowler who can bat. His primary job is still to bowl and get wickets. And with the attack we had this game, and with Siraj not being at his best, I would have still tried Shardul up the hill with the new ball with Bumrah at the other end. When you basically shut a bowler out of the attack, it does not exactly give much of an endorsement and begs the question, why play him anyways if you rate his bowling to be this poor? I mean, I can see NKR getting more overs here than Shardul has.Selectors and team failed to recognize Shardul as the fluke he was and got duped into a false sense of security for SENA tours thinking they had a readymade seamer-allrounder they could call upon when the time came.