• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Search results

  1. J

    Non-whites in SA cricket

    I'm just saying instead of blaming the problems on quota system, blame it on poor selection. There are plenty of poor selection of both black and white players through the last couple years and to blame the current problem on just the selection of black players is just unfair.
  2. J

    One for Richard: Lucky and Unlucky bowlers

    Let say a bowler who average 30 with a strike rate of 40. If he bowls both ends the opposition would be bowled out for 300 in 66.4 overs. THe bowler with a strike rate of 80 but an average of 26 would bowl out the opposition for 260 in 133.2 overs. Personally I prefer the latter performance. So...
  3. J

    Warne blasts Bracewell

    Just because Warne is a hypocrite, doesn't mean his points are less valid.
  4. J

    Non-whites in SA cricket

    Whenever a black players fail, the quota system takes the blame. Whenever a white players fail it is just poor selection. This seems very unfair on the black players and there are added pressure on black players when making their debut that wouldn't occur if they were white. I still believe...
  5. J

    **Official** New Zealand v Australia

    This could possibly be because Australian bowlers bowled better therefore received more 50/50 calls. A more fairer analysis is to calculate the percentage of 50/50 decision (admittingly very subjective on the definition of a 50/50 decision) going towards Australia when they are bowling and the...
  6. J

    **Official** New Zealand v Australia

    I think New Zealand (and other countries) should research why Australian players rarely get injured. I think there is far more to it than luck and that Australian players are just more fitter. I remember when australia were missing 4-5 bowlers through injuries and there were panic and...
  7. J

    Brett Lee - Protected Species?

    Thanks
  8. J

    Brett Lee - Protected Species?

    Sorry I stuffed up. His elbow is not double jointed. I think I'm confusing this double jointed thing with something else. He does straighten his arm but it is not clearly visible and is just as much as any other bowler.
  9. J

    Brett Lee - Protected Species?

    It is virtually impossible to bowl a delivery with a bent arm without straightening it for most people. However Murali is an exception because he is double jointed and can't straighten his arm fully. If you watch footage of Murali bowling you can tell there is no visible straightening of his...
  10. J

    Why Murali does not throw

    I agree that jailing without trial is unacceptable. Actually Habib now has been released and is suing the Australian government. It will be interesting to see how it goes. The point I was making was that telling someone their family been killed when they're actually alive is unacceptable even...
  11. J

    Why Murali does not throw

    I remember Mr Habib (an australian citizen who has been jailed for 2 years without trial for suspected terrorism) claim that he has been told when he was under detention that his family is dead and so he didn't write to his family for an entire year while his family had no idea what happen to...
  12. J

    Why Murali does not throw

    I'm not too sure about that. What do you mean by mental torture? can you give me some examples.
  13. J

    Brett Lee - Protected Species?

    Why do you think he chucks. If you see him straightening his bent arm then that his fair enough but if you just see bowling with the bent arm and then assuming he chucks then that is unfair. IT IS PERFECTLY LEGAL TO BOWL WITH A BENT ARM ACTION
  14. J

    Why Murali does not throw

    Seems like nobody care. hey massive zebra. Where did you get all that information from. To be fair on the American, this is the growing trend around the world. In Australia in a similar poll, over 50% of Australian believes that torture is sometimes justified which seems worrying. I heard...
  15. J

    Why Murali does not throw

    Okay, I will not post another Murali chucking thread at this site. I'm just frustrated at the anti-murali sentiment around and I remember reading Inside Cricket and they basically pay him out every issue. And no I'm not spamming the board
  16. J

    Why Murali does not throw

    If there is a flaw in my argument, please tell me. I'm happy to change my mind if proven wrong.
  17. J

    Australia in 2007 World Cup

    It's nice to see that someone thinks that Bracken has potential. He's been unfairly dismissed as proven failure at test level because of his performance in the Sydney Test. What is less known is that he injured himself fielding during that match which hampered his bowling and would have left the...
  18. J

    Why Murali does not throw

    I apologize for boring you. It just the debates are still going around and I'm still annoyed by the insufficient arguments that the Murali supporters are using to defend him.
  19. J

    Why Murali does not throw

    The reason why a lot of people believe Murali chucks is because of incorrect arguing by Murali supporters. They always say that its a optical illusion that Murali throw and also says that he throw as much as anyone else but they all miss the fundamental reason why Murali doesn't throw...

Top