• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Search results

  1. marc71178

    The LBW Umpire Referral Flaw

    How so? The margin of error means that the umpire is correct in close calls. If the umpire is correct how can the reviewer be correct as there is no evidence to overturn it, hence the review is wrong. Lose a review and move on.
  2. marc71178

    Moores set for the sack

    Not being in the job didn't stop Graves reigniting the KP debacle.
  3. marc71178

    The LBW Umpire Referral Flaw

    But in that case the umpire is right, not you. How hard is it to understand that?
  4. marc71178

    The LBW Umpire Referral Flaw

    The whole point of the current umpires call scenario is that that is how accurate hawkeye is. Can't change it to 25% or something just because you feel like it. As I said earlier, the review system is there to stop howlers, which can be clearly proven to be wrong. If hawkeye shows umpires call...
  5. marc71178

    The LBW Umpire Referral Flaw

    It is not a flaw - it is a part of the system. The predictive element isn't 100% so they have to build some leeway in there. That leeway means that if it falls within those margins, the umpire has not been proven to be incorrect (which is the whole idea of the review) and as such the review is...
  6. marc71178

    *NEW GAME LMS, starting March 26th* (English Football)

    Plymouth to beat Wycombe
  7. marc71178

    ***Official*** England in West Indies 2015

    At this stage he is neither good enough with the bat to be in the top 6 or with the ball to be a front line bowler. Until that changes he shouldn't be in the team.
  8. marc71178

    *Official* English Football Season 2014-15

    What a great signing he turned out to be...
  9. marc71178

    ***Official*** England in West Indies 2015

    Rashid of course being neither of those 2 things if Moeen isn't.
  10. marc71178

    ***Official*** England in West Indies 2015

    We did under Duncan...
  11. marc71178

    ***Official*** England in West Indies 2015

    Woakes is technically the incumbent isn't he?
  12. marc71178

    ***Official*** England in West Indies 2015

    Only about 6 weeks ago. Seems a lot longer.
  13. marc71178

    ***Official*** England in West Indies 2015

    How is him playing in the World Cup a fair few months of injury?
  14. marc71178

    ***Official*** England in West Indies 2015

    Yes, Rashid's bowling is being more and more overrated as time goes by. Can't help but think Tredwell would've done a good job on this pitch.
  15. marc71178

    ***Official*** England in West Indies 2015

    No it's not.
  16. marc71178

    Forum sweepstake: Who will be James Anderson's 400th Test wicket?

    Looking a chance. Reckon it'll be sometime in the next 2 days
  17. marc71178

    Pietersen vs Sangakkara

    Was it bollocks - Lara isn't responsible for the performances of the other 10 players in the team.
  18. marc71178

    Cricket Web.net Fantasy Test Draft

    So you're moving the goalposts again then? 24 hours unless you change your mind...
  19. marc71178

    ICC puts Sri Lankan board funding on hold

    Nitty gritties like pointing out you're posting **** you mean?
  20. marc71178

    ICC puts Sri Lankan board funding on hold

    Owns does not mean produce. You could do without ever posting.

Top