Chandra won a game in WI single-handedly against an ATG batting unit, has 21 wicket in 4 games. I think Very Good is fair. For comparison, Underwood averages twice as much, and has less than one fourth the wickets.
3 to NZ, which I don't rate much. So 3 in 77 vs 2 in 50. Also, no comment on the WPM?
I don't hold WPM in too high a regard. It is greatly influenced by the quality of the bowlers sharing the attack. In Underwood's case he had strike bowlers of the quality of Snow and Willis and, later, a young Botham to share the wickets.
Chandra had Bedi and Prasanna as well and having a stronger attack should also mean more all outs. 3.13 for a frontline spinner is genuinely poor penetration
Out of interest, how often did all 3 play together?
They played 24 tests together, in those matches:
Which part exactly?
The complete thing
You're being unreasonable, no need to be this pissy just because not everyone has a crush on bookies and don't have them over actual great players, it's like getting pissy cuz someone has Gower over Azhar.
Consider shutting up probably.
More like Wasim Jaffer over Azhar
Richardson has better stats than Asif, Jaffer doesn't have better stats than Azhar, another fail. come again. You are better than this.
Ok adam voges
Yeah lmao the 16 extra wickets Asif took in 20 extra innings completely changea the complexion of their sample size. Get a grip on reality.
Jock Cameron!!! He was rated as an equal to Oldfield, as in no clear majority existed as who was better between him, Oldfield and Duckworth. And managed to average 30 in Tests and 37 in FC as well! Tragically life got cut short, or else I am very very confident he would be atleast rated as an equal to Knott.
Feel Imtiaz was more of a batter keeper though, Cameron was arguably a Top 10 glovesman ever
