Washington really impressed me with the ball, he was by far the best spinner this series in really difficult conditions, he should be one of the first names on the teamsheet. Jadeja didn’t do much, but he’s 36 and you have only 2 more Tests outside of Asia this WTC cycle. Genuinely not sure what Thakur is supposed to be, you can’t be a 4th/5th choice bowler AND a number 8 batter, what’s the point? I get the idea behind Reddy, and he’ll get another go, but he wasn’t good enough this seriesOrdinary figures for our 4th bowler whether you designate Jadeja/Sundar as one or Shardul/NKR as one. I hope India starts picking better 4th bowler. Jadeja and Sundar can play in top 7 as batsmen, forget they bowl outside subcontinent.
Because reddy was forced to bat defensively this series. He is naturally attacking player who did well in Australia. Needs to add 5 miles to speed and improve his temperment. Maybe should play a season of county cricketWashington really impressed me with the ball, he was by far the best spinner this series in really difficult conditions, he should be one of the first names on the teamsheet. Jadeja didn’t do much, but he’s 36 and you have only 2 more Tests outside of Asia this WTC cycle. Genuinely not sure what Thakur is supposed to be, you can’t be a 4th/5th choice bowler AND a number 8 batter, what’s the point? I get the idea behind Reddy, and he’ll get another go, but he wasn’t good enough this series
Bunrah averaged 26 with 14 poles in three matches on the most roady wickets, That’s excellent by any standardMy ratings
First india
Jaiswal- 6=started and ended well. Needs to be bit more tighter outside off stump
Rahul -8= looked consistent for first time in his career. Classy player
Sai sudharshan-3= needs to play more freely uber defensive. Might do well at home
Gill-9 = finally showed why he was rated highly. Hope he continues to do well with bat. Need improve captaincy tho
Pant-9=our x factor. Hope he comes back even better
Nair-4= gave his wicket after being set. Might be tempted to give him series vs wi. Gun slip fielder
Jadeja-8=had great series with bat. Disappointing with ball
Nitsh-5=did well at lords with ball but needs to improve with bat
Thakur-4=he is done
Sundar-8= teriffc series with bat and bowl. His knock at oval won the match
Bumrah-7=medicore series according to his high strandeds but hope he comes back well
Siraj-8=lion hearted bowler does donkey work
Akashdeep-7=needs to improve fitness. Won us game at edgbaston
Prasidh-7=picked wickets but need to bowl consistent line and length
Kamboj-2=not international class
Jurel-6= good keeper but must improve batting
And by no standard equal to Akashdeep and ****ing Prasidh Krishna. Think Prasidh won over a few, not me really. His overall series was well sub par even given pitches.Bunrah averaged 26 with 14 poles in three matches on the most roady wickets, That’s excellent by any standard
I think the best that can be said about Prasidh is that he has some skills that are hard to coach and with coaching and more experience he may develop into a valuable bowler, a bit like Umesh YadavAnd by no standard equal to Akashdeep and ****ing Prasidh Krishna. Think Prasidh won over a few, not me really. His overall series was well sub par even given pitches.
I frankly don't just seems there. Feel he mentally isn't just strong enough. And do he lacks any kind of consistency...... Has skills but what Good they are if you can't control your line and length?I think the best that can be said about Prasidh is that he has some skills that are hard to coach and with coaching and more experience he may develop into a valuable bowler, a bit like Umesh Yadav
if shami is fit he walks into this team and yes I think he has one last goI frankly don't just seems there. Feel he mentally isn't just strong enough. And do he lacks any kind of consistency...... Has skills but what Good they are if you can't control your line and length?
On a side note, do you guys think Shami won't get a Test again? Or at best something like WI and SA at Home to send him off??
Maybe a 7/10 series by his stratospheric standards, but he was better than Siraj and any other Indian bowler, only Stokes was close in the bowling departmentBunrah averaged 26 with 14 poles in three matches on the most roady wickets, That’s excellent by any standard
He has a knack of picking wickets, but his line and length are still off. Despite that brilliant Yorker on Day 5, there was a difference in class between him and Siraj. I feel the best he can try to do is what Ishant Sharma did from 2014 onward to become a quality seamer, particularly with the older ball. Ultimately he has to have the zeal to learn and shape his technique for the longer format. Going by the fact that he's going for 6-7 runs an over, it remains on his to-do list.And by no standard equal to Akashdeep and ****ing Prasidh Krishna. Think Prasidh won over a few, not me really. His overall series was well sub par even given pitches.
Very Good post thisVery bad day as an Indian fan . This would be like SS Das becoming captain in 2000 or Raina becoming captain in 2010 . This is the beginning of the end of Indian Test team . Guy who averages 20 overseas is our Test Captain![]()
He didn't.Gonna quietly back The Lord to win us this series.
He did.No major shockers for me in the selection. We have had the cyclic retirements thingy going since the original fab 4 days of Dravid-Sachin-Ganguly-Laxman. We lose an entire generation of players in 1 or 2 years and then we end up having to punt on a young/unproven captain all of a sudden. IIRC, Virat became captain at a time when people questioned his position as a batsman overseas in tests too. Hopefully Gill does just as good a job as Virat did. And maybe ages more gracefully as a batsman in his 30s.
My only surprise is they did not include a couple more (Shreyas and Harshit probably) and make it a 18 member squad.
Not going to argue with any of that. What hurt England this series was not getting what might well be our best available attack on the park at the same time. That for me would be Atkinson, Archer & Carse. I would like to see a fully fit Carse in Australia, where his 'hard length' bowling might get some reward out there rather than the slow and low tracks we largely saw this summer. I also see what you do with Crawley and Pope. I think the latter will predictably fail. How on earth he has lasted these years with his head falling over, I don't know. It is one of those things that riles me in my test cricket watching.Series ratings:
England
Crawley (3 50s, 290 runs at 32.22) 5/10, what can you say, the Crawley culture wars continue, he’ll have done enough to keep his place in the team, but nowhere near enough to silence the doubters
Duckett (1 100, 3 50s, 462 runs at 51.33) 8/10, you know what you’re going to get with Duckett, he’ll charge at everything, which will lead to some thrilling knocks but also some soft dismissals. Still one of the best openers in world cricket
Pope (1 100, 1 50, 306 runs at 34) 5/10, not unlike Crawley, but whereas Crawley can at least say he is (the lesser) half of England’s most successful opening partnership since Cook and Strauss, Pope doesn’t even have that going for him. He’ll go to the Ashes, I think he’ll get all 5 games but will struggle and then I think the serious discussion over his place in the team will start
Root (3 100s, 1 50, 537 runs at 67.12) 9/10, what can you say about him that hasn’t already been said? He’ll be devastated about the method of his dismissal yesterday evening, but he helped win us our two games, and put us in a winning position at Old Trafford and the Oval
Brook (2 100s, 2 50s, 481 runs at 53.44) 7/10, took advantage of chances at Headingley and the Oval to hit some big scores, but he’s only got one gear
Stokes (1 100, 0 50s, 304 runs at 43.42, 17 wickets at 25.23) 9/10, bowling was hugely encouraging, the only one to get anything going at Old Trafford you understand why he bowled himself into the ground, hopefully he’s fit and firing for the Ashes. Came back into form with the bat at Old Trafford
Smith (18 catches, 1 stumping, 1 100, 2 50s, 434 runs at 62) 8/10, tailed off with the bat, a terrible dismissal just now, but perhaps his overall drop off with the bat is understandable considering he’s been very busy behind the stumps, especially at the Oval when he had some absolute dross being bowled at him
Woakes (11 wickets at 52.18, 64 runs at 10.66) 4/10, clearly not what he was, but I don’t think he bowled that badly until his injury, I think we’ll miss his bowling Down Under. It’s not his primary skill, but his batting has completely collapsed, I don’t know why he continues to come out at number 8 when Carse and Atkinson are clearly better batters
Carse (9 wickets at 60.88, 1 50, 164 runs at 27.33) 4/10, thought he bowled well at Lord’s, but did struggle overall, especially at Old Trafford. His batting is a bonus, but you wonder if he’s been usurped by Tongue
Tongue (19 wickets at 29.05), 7/10, ends up as England’s leading wicket taker, can be wayward, but bowls wicket taking deliveries, I think he’s nudged ahead of Carse in the pecking order now
Bashir (10 wickets at 54.1), 5/10, gets flak for obvious reasons, but I thought he did OK on pitches that weren’t suited to him at all. Whether his height will make him effective in Australia is…up for debate, but like Crawley and Pope, he’s surely going to play
Archer (9 wickets at 28.66), 8/10, lovely to have him back, fitness permitting, he walks into this team, just have to be careful with him!
Atkinson (8 wickets at 20, 28 runs at 11) 8/10, possibly England’s best bowler when fit, thought he came through OK despite having to bowl nearly 50 overs off the back of hardly any cricket, but hopefully won’t have to do much of that again!
Overton (2 wickets at 82, 9 runs at 4.5), 2/10, got a bit better in the second innings, unlucky that England shelled a few catches, but a poor show in the first innings in friendly conditions. Perhaps a bit unlucky to be given out so late in the second innings, but did get a duck in the first innings
Dawson (1 wicket at 140, 26 runs at 26) 5/10, economical (OK, he wasn’t threatening and India were happy to block him in the second innings at Old Trafford) and did contribute a bit with the bat, which you’d think would carry some weight with most teams (especially with an Ashes series to come), but surely won’t with this management
Bethell (11 runs at 5.5, 0/17), 1/10, the gamble didn’t pay off, he looked like a white ball player who didn’t know how to deal with not being able to score, but is that surprising when he’s played so little red ball cricket?