• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Battle of the Combos

subshakerz

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Which are better for an average side?

Chappell/Border or Ponting/Waugh

Donald/Pollock or Lindwall/Miller

Imran/Wasim or McWarne
 
Johan

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Chappell/Border

Chappell~Ponting
Border>Waugh

Just better team 1 is

Lindwall/Miller

Donald~Lindwall
Miller>Pollock

huge batting output gap.

McWarne

McGrath>Imran
Warne>Wasim

bowling gap.
 
subshakerz

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Johan said:
Chappell/Border

Chappell~Ponting
Border>Waugh

Just better team 1 is

Lindwall/Miller

Donald~Lindwall
Miller>Pollock

huge batting output gap.

McWarne

McGrath>Imran
Warne>Wasim

bowling gap.
Click to expand...
Doesn't the batting make up for Imran Wasim?
 
R

reyrey

State Regular
Chappell/Border - They are just better

Lindwall/Miller - Bowling about equal (might be marginally inferior) but they they add a lot more batting

McWarne - More overs of quality bowling thanks to Warne
 
Johan

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
subshakerz said:
Fair. Though I consider Warnes peak to be 93 to 97 and McGraths 95 onwards but Warne was still worldclass in the 2000s.
Click to expand...
I consider it to be the 2000s due to what he was doing away, I know he had home issues on those flat decks but he was absolutely amazing away from home

Loading…

stats.espncricinfo.com

6.32 WPM, 44 Strike rate, even lower than McGrath etc
 
subshakerz

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Johan said:
I consider it to be the 2000s due to what he was doing away, I know he had home issues on those flat decks but he was absolutely amazing away from home

Loading…

stats.espncricinfo.com

6.32 WPM, 44 Strike rate, even lower than McGrath etc
Click to expand...
Nah. Mid 90s Warne was something else IMO.
 
A

Al Salvador

School Boy/Girl Captain
Chappell/Border
Lindwall/Miller (easiest one)
Imran/Wasim

Last one is interesting, in terms of quality Imran/Wasim due to batting factor but im not sure Imran/Wasim will peak together in same match, McWarne more likely to do that. It's tough.

I rate both Donald and Lindwall very highly, Lindwall better as bowler by hair but lindwall was a very good no 8. Pollock was slightly better bowler than Miller (i'm not exactly sure because I feel Miller was more destructive bowler on flat pitches) but there's a humongous gap between them as batsman. It's not even close.
 
kyear2

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Al Salvador said:
Donald/Pollock above Lindwall/Miller is utter woke nonsense
Click to expand...
Or I rate Donald as a butter bowler than either and Pollock probably about equal or just below Lindwall and ahead of Miller...

Donald and Pollock bowling out the opposition for less.
 
subshakerz

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
kyear2 said:
Or I rate Donald as a butter bowler than either and Pollock probably about equal or just below Lindwall and ahead of Miller...

Donald and Pollock bowling out the opposition for less.
Click to expand...
Not sure if Miller is really that inferior to Pollock.
 
subshakerz

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
In an average side, Miller will occupy no.5/6 allowing you to pick an extra bowler. Lindwall is a great no.8 though Pollock a bit better.

They make more sense for a side.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top