• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Richard Hadlee vs Curtly Ambrose

Who was the greater bowler?

  • Richard Hadlee

    Votes: 45 67.2%
  • Curtly Ambrose

    Votes: 22 32.8%

  • Total voters
    67

Patience and Accuracy+Gut

State Vice-Captain
What really seprated the Invincibles from Australia before the war was the bowling attack

Lindwall.
Miller.
Johnston.

and then Toshack and Johnson can come in at any point. It's the Best Batsman of all time (Don) combined with great batting support (Harvey, Morris, Hassett, Brown, Miller) then combined with maybe the second or third greatest bowling attack of all time.
Just imagine a spinner up there that we were producing in 30s. Not O’Reilly or Grimmett level but even Ironmonger levelish and that’s probably the best bowling lineup of all time.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Marshall retired : 33 years
McGrath retired : 37 years
Hadlee retired : 39 years

I do not think Marshall would have sustained his excellence if he played till 36 years let alone 39 years
So this is it, after everything else, were down to conjecture.

I don't think isn't the basis of an argument.

Marshall was quicker than all of those gentleman and for a sustained period. He had a ridiculously condensed schedule of 5 test series, and a full county load. They didn't have a spinner to eat overs and he went all out. Yes, it would have worn on his body.

But there's nothing besides guesses at this point that would project how he would have adapted or performed.

Anyways, hope you don't take any of this personally, I do rate you as a poster.
 

DrWolverine

International Vice-Captain
When did Sir Richard Hadlee become a minnow basher?

IMG_8251.jpeg

Even against Pakistan, he had two ATG series.
18 wickets in 3 Tests.
16 wickets in 3 Tests.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
This is where you again are disingenuous.

You deliberately say 25% more to make it seem like more than it was.

Marshall has 6 MOS awards from 21 series. Hadlee had 8 from 33 series.
Two of which, btw were against SL

Also I'm not even intimating that Hadlee is anything less than superb, he is very much no. 3 all time for me, it's not much of an argument. But the batsmen and pundits of the era didn't rate nearly as highly as we do.
There's nothing disingenuous about this. I just quoted that figure to call out BS on "Marshall was the man" and using man of series metric while Hadlee has more.

If you care to think a little you'll see that the 33 figure for Hadlee is misleading. He didn't play 33 full series. His total number of tests are pretty much the same as Marshall.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Also I'm not even intimating that Hadlee is anything less than superb, he is very much no. 3 all time for me, it's not much of an argument. But the batsmen and pundits of the era didn't rate nearly as highly as we do.
The only reason Hadlee got less pundit rating was because he was from NZ.

He appears in quite a few ATG XIs by peer cricketers by the way.
 

Swamp Witch Hattie

U19 12th Man
kyear2 response to smash84.JPG

@smash84 actually underestimated Hadlee's margin: he has 33 1/3% more POTS than Marshall who has 25% fewer POTS than Hadlee (8 is 33 1/3% bigger than 6 which is 25% smaller than 8).

Hadlee has just one POTS against SL, BTW, not two unless you were talking about the number of series played against SL in which case Hadlee, in fact, played three series against them: two Tests in 1983, three in 1984 and one in 1987 (that series was abandoned due to civil unrest).

I don't think they gave a POTS award for the 1980 NZ-WI series but if they had, Hadlee would have surely won it for his superb all-round performances:

Hadlee WI 1980.JPG

So that makes it 9 POTS for Hadlee, putting him 50% ahead of Marshall!

Remember, you mustn't speak ill of the dead:

TARUHERU_21_145.jpg
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
View attachment 47380

@smash84 actually underestimated Hadlee's margin: he has 33 1/3% more POTS than Marshall who has 25% fewer POTS than Hadlee (8 is 33 1/3% bigger than 6 which is 25% smaller than 8).

Hadlee has just one POTS against SL, BTW, not two unless you were talking about the number of series played against SL in which case Hadlee, in fact, played three series against them: two Tests in 1983, three in 1984 and one in 1987 (that series was abandoned due to civil unrest).

I don't think they gave a POTS award for the 1980 NZ-WI series but if they had, Hadlee would have surely won it for his superb all-round performances:

View attachment 47381

So that makes it 9 POTS for Hadlee, putting him 50% ahead of Marshall!

Remember, you mustn't speak ill of the dead:

View attachment 47382
iirc player of the match/series began to be a semi-regular thing in the 80’s. Unsure from when exactly that became an every game and series thing.

Fun exercise perhaps for us tortured souls would be to go back and award those awards for every single test and series in cricket history. Anyone game?

Also daily reminder that Jacques Kallis has the most MotM in test history.
 

Patience and Accuracy+Gut

State Vice-Captain
iirc player of the match/series began to be a semi-regular thing in the 80’s. Unsure from when exactly that became an every game and series thing.

Fun exercise perhaps for us tortured souls would be to go back and award those awards for every single test and series in cricket history. Anyone game?

Also daily reminder that Jacques Kallis has the most MotM in test history.
@capt_Luffy might be interested.
 

DrWolverine

International Vice-Captain
Don Bradman played 11 test series.
I am guessing except the Bodyline, he would have won every single one of them.
 

Top