That depends on how he rates these players.No
Which one of
1. Marshall
2. Mcgrath
3. Hadlee
4. Barnes
5. Steyn
6. Ambrose
7. Imran
8. Lillee
9. Garner
10. Holding
11. Lindwall
12. Trueman
13. Akram
14. Donald
15. Bumrah
Are you not putting ahead (with Waqar, Davidson, Cummins, Rabada and Pollock all arguable too)
So basically my listPacers better than him that I can think of, in chronological order
Barnes
Lindwall
Trueman
Lillee
Holding
Hadlee
Imran
Marshall
Garner
Akram
Ambrose
Donald
McGrath
Steyn
Bumrah
so...No.
Waqar > RobertsThose who he is debateable with – Rabada, Cummins, Pollock, Davidson, Roberts.
so...No.
NahWaqar > Roberts
drop the top 20No he maybe doesn't make the top 20
Definitely ahead:drop the top 20
Miller idk about but Rest makes sense.Definitely ahead:
Marshall, Barnes, McGrath, Hadlee, Steyn, Imran, Lillee, Ambrose, Truman, Donald, Lindwall
Most likely ahead:
Bumrah, Cummins, Roberts, Miller, Davidson, Waqar, Rabada
Maybe Pollock too.
Miller and Roberts no for me, Pollock yesDefinitely ahead:
Marshall, Barnes, McGrath, Hadlee, Steyn, Imran, Lillee, Ambrose, Truman, Donald, Lindwall
Most likely ahead:
Bumrah, Cummins, Roberts, Miller, Davidson, Waqar, Rabada
Maybe Pollock too.
Yeah that's why I argued maybe he doesn't make the top 20.Miller idk about but Rest makes sense.
ThisMiller and Roberts no for me, Pollock yes
Don't make me hurt youNo
Which one of
1. Marshall
2. Mcgrath
3. Hadlee
4. Barnes
5. Steyn
6. Ambrose
7. Imran
8. Lillee
9. Garner
10. Holding
11. Lindwall
12. Trueman
13. Akram
14. Donald
15. Bumrah
Are you not putting ahead (with Waqar, Davidson, Cummins, Rabada and Pollock all arguable too)