He averages almost 30 in FC. What are you on to suggest that, when he played all his games against Australia and batted Top order?? And if 35 in Test isn't reflective of his batting ability, then so isn't 20.7 of his bowling, given he goes sub 15 in FC.
Cocaine?
I took Cocaine once, Doctor Grace visited me and said AG Steel is his genetic clone.
Stuff like this made the doctor not get voted in the first 2 XIs
This can be used to demotivate drug addicts.
He played in matches where the aggregate average was sub 20. Again, a very good batting record, but that's it for me.
Then his batting record>Turner's bowling, and his bowling is just a pure plus
Stanley Jackson>>Victor Trumper.
Don't say anything you don't believe in yourself. Trumper's FC record is miles better than Jackson, and Steel's is also easily better than Turner.
The one I said was just appealing to how you were comparing the players and wasn't meant to be taken literally. One doesn't need to be very bright to comprehend that.
Sure.
Steel might be better. None of them are easily better than the other imo. Turner took 2 more wickets per match while going at a similar/slightly better average in FC, while not close to being close in Test. Steel's batting was very good, and might take him ahead of Turner. Might be off topic, but Lohmann and Turner are very close, and talking about Steel being ahead of one while not mentioning the other doesn't make sense to me. All the points applicable to Turner being inferior applies to Lohmann to a similar extend. I'll give Turner vs Steel a thought personally. Don't want to argue further.
The more unbelievable part of the post
"I took cocaine" or "I took cocaine once"?
The former
Chicken
WAFG