Yeah, his record in Australia especially isn't particularly great.He’s one of us except with a popular youtube channel.
He was that guy in county, sure. In tests, no.
I agree. In fact, it may be the first time a Second XI is a better all round attack.Miller+Sanga gives you practically the same batting and a World Class bowler. Miller, Imran, Ambrose, Barnes and Murali; this team can legit beat the World XI in a few games.
WKAfter this round, how are you going to call for the next positions?
I don't think it's nearly the same batting considering Sanga is the wkb a not a pure bat. The bowling improves ofc but Miller is the 5th bowler here. That's a lower impact. The 4 ATG bowlers are more than enough imo, especially with Barnes and Murali, where you don't even have to worry about workload.Miller+Sanga gives you practically the same batting and a World Class bowler. Miller, Imran, Ambrose, Barnes and Murali; this team can legit beat the World XI in a few games.
Neither was Sanga the wicket-keeper.Watling wasn't a Top 15 batsman though.
Still doesn't facilitate a 36 averaging batsmanI agree. And allows us to vote Miller more easily.
Ok that's fine. I suggest you make the calls separately for keeper and final two.WK
The two others to complete the team
It does if he bats at no.7, followed by Imran at no.8Still doesn't facilitate a 36 averaging batsman
I think this 5 man attack has so much balance that it would be a pretty big improvement. And yeah, Kallis/Knott batting is better but imo not by a big margin really. Now considering you have Imran at 8, Sangakkara/Miller seems way too tempting.I don't think it's nearly the same batting considering Sanga is the wkb a not a pure bat. The bowling improves ofc but Miller is the 5th bowler here. That's a lower impact. The 4 ATG bowlers are more than enough imo, especially with Barnes and Murali, where you don't even have to worry about workload.
It's still an incredibly strong lower order.I think this 5 man attack has so much balance that it would be a pretty big improvement. And yeah, Kallis/Knott batting is better but imo not by a big margin really. Now considering you have Imran at 8, Sangakkara/Miller seems way too tempting.
Neither is Sanga.Watling wasn't a Top 15 batsman though.
Disagree. Even if you don't have him in 15, it has to be in the periphery of that.Neither is Sanga.
Neither was Sanga with the gloves. He was around Watling level.Watling wasn't a Top 15 batsman though.
Pre peak Batting at 3.Neither was Sanga with the gloves
A big turning lh spinner and a "mystery" spinner at that.Walcott kept well to Ramadhin and Valentine on uncovered 1950s English Wickets, must be pretty great to spin
You have Barnes and Murali though too, I'd not use my 5th bowler all that much tbh, when you've got these two top 5 bowlers of all time, who can basically bowl non stop at a high level.I think this 5 man attack has so much balance that it would be a pretty big improvement. And yeah, Kallis/Knott batting is better but imo not by a big margin really. Now considering you have Imran at 8, Sangakkara/Miller seems way too tempting.
Even when in peak he struggled when he had to take over keeping duties (small sample size but those are the facts). And yes he always batted at 3. Big difference to batting 6 or 7 and almost guaranteed to also affect his output.Pre peak Batting at 3.
Depth doesn't make up for quality.It does if he bats at no.7, followed by Imran at no.8