• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

3rd Test (Lord’s) - 10 July to 14 July

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
You can't just arbitrarily reduce the margins wtf. The makers of Hawkeye are the ones who said the error margins are half a ball. It's possible the tech is more accurate now, but that would have to come from Hawkeye themselves, backed with some evidence to support it
No they didn’t. Iirc they said the margin of error is miniscule and the 50% is just arbitrary to keep umpires relevant.
 

slowfinger

International Regular
Nah. LBW has become too prominent as it is; the LBW law has been adjusted in the past to ensure it remains in good balance with the rest of the game, there's no reason it can't be adjusted again to prevent it being even more prominent. It simply isn't healthy for the game to have a large proportion of dismissals based on what is ultimately a hypothetical.

This isn't exactly an opinion I've just come up with either, I've been banging this drum for ages. The idea that you can get given because the ball might have clipped the top 1mm corner of leg stump is frankly ****.
well you need to disincentivise batsmen from simply kicking the ball away, no matter how hypothetical the situation.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
You can't just arbitrarily reduce the margins wtf. The makers of Hawkeye are the ones who said the error margins are half a ball. It's possible the tech is more accurate now, but that would have to come from Hawkeye themselves, backed with some evidence to support it
That was 10 years ago. Not anymore
 

Spark

Global Moderator
well you need to disincentivise batsmen from simply kicking the ball away, no matter how hypothetical the situation.
I'm not asking for a large adjustment. The overwhelming majority of out dimissals would be unchanged. I essentially just think most "umpire's call" decisions should be simply not out (with the caveat that the very stupid oversight where DRS currently pretends the bails don't exist needs to be fixed)
 

Spark

Global Moderator
No they didn’t. Iirc they said the margin of error is miniscule and the 50% is just arbitrary to keep umpires relevant.
Yeah this is correct from what I've heard and certainly what I'd expect the technology to be capable of.
 

Top