It's against a Zim bowling attack with very poor spinners and were missing Muzarabani for his 100, does it really prove that he can be no.3 for South Africa?Really pleased for Mulder, he has come in for a lot of stick recently, but a ton and 4 wickets should quieten the critics for a short while, but he should be 6 or 7 not bat at 3,
He is saying he isn't a 3.It's against a Zim bowling attack with very poor spinners and were missing Muzarabani for his 100, does it really prove that he can be no.3 for South Africa?
Who bats 3 if he doesn't is the issue. None of Stubbs or beddingham suited to it either.Really pleased for Mulder, he has come in for a lot of stick recently, but a ton and 4 wickets should quieten the critics for a short while, but he should be 6 or 7 not bat at 3,
Can only play what's infront of you. Others faced the same opposition and didn't take their chance.It's against a Zim bowling attack with very poor spinners and were missing Muzarabani for his 100, does it really prove that he can be no.3 for South Africa?
Stubbs' record at 3 is actually better than his record at 4 or 5, although it is a small sample size. That doesn't necessarily mean that 3 is where he should be batting, but I don't think you can call trying him a 3 a failed experiment.Who bats 3 if he doesn't is the issue. None of Stubbs or beddingham suited to it either.
I think shuks moving him away from there and placing Mulder there says that atleast in his mind wiaan is the better option.Stubbs' record at 3 is actually better than his record at 4 or 5, although it is a small sample size. That doesn't necessarily mean that 3 is where he should be batting, but I don't think you can call trying him a 3 a failed experiment.
He’s a prince thoughPrince Masvaure makes zero sense in the Zim Test squad, he's 36 years old with a modest FC record , it's these type of selections that hold Zimbabwe back .
Easy this Test batting thing.