Coronis
Hall of Fame Member
I can’t keep track of all your crazy takes.did I ever say Gooch>Younis
I can’t keep track of all your crazy takes.did I ever say Gooch>Younis
You have far crazier takes than meI can’t keep track of all your crazy takes.
I'll try:Let me try to rank Windies bats and see where both fall, seriously
Viv
Sobers
Lara
Headley
Weekes
Walcott
Worrell
Kanhai
Lloyd
Greenidge
Richardson
Hunte
Chanderpaul
Haynes
Nurse
Gayle
Utterly atrocious. Kanhai himself would slap you in the face for suggesting he is better than Weekes and Walcott.I'll try:
1. Lara
2. Viv
3. Sobers
4. Headley
5. Greenidge
6. Kanhai
7. Weekes
8. Walcott
9. Lloyd
10. Chanderpaul
11. Worrell
12. Richardson
13. Nurse
14. Hunte
15. Gayle
Your hates too strong.... Anyways:Let me try to rank Windies bats and see where both fall, seriously
Viv
Sobers
Lara
Headley
Weekes
Walcott
Worrell
Kanhai
Lloyd
Greenidge
Richardson
Hunte
Chanderpaul
Haynes
Nurse
Gayle
Kanhai was absolute quality. He's not as big of a legend, or heralded as much for historic reasons. As a pure batter only, I believe he's quite underrated as opposed to the Ws, and I'd take Kanhai over them.Utterly atrocious. Kanhai himself would slap you in the face for suggesting he is better than Weekes and Walcott.
as good as he was, I don't really see him being in the same class as those two, output gap is too big and Kanhai had substantially easier era, I really can't see how a healthy Weekes or Walcott can be matched by Rohan, like those two just ate bowling lineups in a way I can't see Rohan do.Kanhai was absolute quality. He's not as big of a legend, or heralded as much for historic reasons. As a pure batter only, I believe he's quite underrated as opposed to the Ws, and I'd take Kanhai over them.
All of those guys high quality bats though.
looks like England has a lot more batting depth historically than WI, out 30th bat would be much better than Braithwaite, Zak is better than KraiggYour hates too strong.... Anyways:
- Garry Sobers
- Viv Richards
- Brian Lara
- George Headley
- Everton Weekes
- Clyde Walcott
- Rohan Kanhai
- Frank Worrell
- Clive Lloyd
- Gordon Greenidge
- Shivnarine Chanderpaul
- Conrad Hunte
- Richie Richardson
- Alvin Kallicharran
- Roy Fredericks
- Chris Gayle
- Desmond Haynes
- Seymour Nurse
- Basil Butcher
- Lawrence Rowe
- Jeff Stollmeyer
- Larry Gomes
- Jimmy Adams
- Ramnaresh Sarwan
- Carl Hooper
- Charlie Davis
- Allan Rae
- Darren Bravo
- Kraigg Brathwaite
- George Challenor
- Roy Marshall
- Gus Logie
- Joe Solomon
- Marlon Samuels
- Jermaih Blackwood
- Nkrumah Bonner
- Brandon Nash
- Keith Arthurton
- John Holt
- Gerry Gomez
- Sherwin Campbell
- Jason Holder
- Clifford Roach
- Kyle Mayers
- Jeff Dujon
- Denis Atkinson
- Wavell Hinds
- Shai Hope
- Maurice Foster
- John Goddard
Don't think works for Ws. They had stupidly easy Home pitches and generally did poorly away, albeit for a plethora of reasons. Kanhai's away record is significantly superior.as good as he was, I don't really see him being in the same class as those two, output gap is too big and Kanhai had substantially easier era, I really can't see how a healthy Weekes or Walcott can be matched by Rohan, like those two just ate bowling lineups in a way I can't see Rohan do.
Yup, quality really falls after the top 25 guyslooks like England has a lot more batting depth historically than WI, out 30th bat would be much better than Braithwaite, Zak is better than Kraigg
Duhlooks like England has a lot more batting depth historically than WI, out 30th bat would be much better than Braithwaite, Zak is better than Kraigg
The bowling standards of sides like Australia and Pakistan were significantly inferior in the 60sDon't think works for Ws. They had stupidly easy Home pitches and generally did poorly away, albeit for a plethora of reasons. Kanhai's away record is significantly superior.
India was better in the 60s imo, and Pak only for Mahmood. Australia was worse but not significantly so.The bowling standards of sides like Australia, Pakistan and India were significantly inferior in the 60s
They can still take your AT XI thoughlooks like England has a lot more batting depth historically than WI, out 30th bat would be much better than Braithwaite, Zak is better than Kraigg
early 60s No and that's when his 70 avg series came iirc, and I think the attack Walcott put to the sword in 1954-55 series was definitely way superior to the one Kanhai made twin tons against or averaged 50+ against in early 1970India was better in the 60s imo, and Pak only for Mahmood. Australia was worse but not significantly so.
Grace solos by using his secret technique, refusing to acknowledge his wicket.They can still take your AT XI though
Yeah, WI had some Real Greats, and some Real Turds. Very few in between like others.They can still take your AT XI though
Sobers, and Marshall solo (both of these guys solo yes), by being Sobers and Marshall. The Doctor has some real competition here.Grace solos by using his secret technique, refusing to acknowledge his wicket.
I will apply the theorem of sports advancement and West Indies is the only team that would lose to england with that, would declare all Cricket before 2000 as Semi professional and amateurSobers, and Marshall solo (both of these guys solo yes), by being Sobers and Marshall. The Doctor has some real competition here.