• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

2nd Test (Edgbaston) - July 2nd

jaydesh

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
With a thrilling victory in Leeds for England, who chased 371 on day 5, they are ahead so far 1-0. India will hope to level the series with hope of having a good chance of winning the series.
 

Arachnödouche2.0

State 12th Man
We have to leverage our strengths. In Kuldeep, similar to Bumrah, we have an ace that England can't hope to match (imagine the combination they would've made on the dry Headingley wicket). I fully believe it's a karmic crime keeping him out and we'll continue losing in hapless fashion until he's a permanent member of the XI.
 

Blenkinsop

State 12th Man
We have to leverage our strengths. In Kuldeep, similar to Bumrah, we have an ace that England can't hope to match (imagine the combination they would've made on the dry Headingley wicket). I fully believe it's a karmic crime keeping him out and we'll continue losing in hapless fashion until he's a permanent member of the XI.
Didn't Kuldeep play a series in England way back? If I remember right he caused all sorts of problems for one or two games and then England figured out how to play him and he was largely innocuous after that.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Didn't Kuldeep play a series in England way back? If I remember right he caused all sorts of problems for one or two games and then England figured out how to play him and he was largely innocuous after that.
Not really. He played a single test at Lord's in 2018 when it was a spinner's graveyard and took an expensive 0/44. The last test he played against England was in Dharamsala, with match figures of 7/112. Only played thirteen tests in total, which is pretty unforgivable.
 
Last edited:

Xix2565

International Regular
I would go Jurel/Akash/Kuldeep in for Bumrah/Sai/Shardul (assuming Bumrah misses this game). I don't see the point in ditching Prasidh this quickly, he's still only played 4 Tests.
 

Silver Silva

International Vice-Captain
I would go Jurel/Akash/Kuldeep in for Bumrah/Sai/Shardul (assuming Bumrah misses this game). I don't see the point in ditching Prasidh this quickly, he's still only played 4 Tests.
I would play Washington Sundar at No.3 ..

●He averages 90 in the 3 tests he has played v England ,

●He's been batting there in domestic cricket ,so not as big a gamble as it seems

● Had some early success in international cricket, so wont be nervous in playing a big series like a rookie batsman will be

● I think India need as many bowling options as possible especially if Bumrah is gonna be rested, and Sundar although he didn't take many wickets vs England he did manage to be economical which is just as important v Bazball to build pressure .

●If you play Sundar at No.3 you open up so many options, NKR can play as a No.7 in place of Jadeja or you can give Jurel the gloves and let Pant play as pure batsmen , just many more options available
 
Last edited:

Johan

International Coach
Really no reason to drop Prasidh and Thakur yet, give them the whole series or atleast the first three games, same with Jadeja who is too experienced to be replaced readily. Hope we get Gus and Archer for the next game, if Archer can summon any of the old fire he had in 2019 this should be fun.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
Jadeja is the senior bowler and and senior lower-middle bat. There being problems in these areas doesn't automatically mean you drop him, it means improving there is a case of him getting his act together, which he probably will.

Same as Woakes for England. He had a crap game, but is required to come good for the attack to make sense.

If I were India I would consider Sundar or Kuldeep for Thakur, but hold it there so long as Bumrah is fit.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Only bowled 18 overs in the County match he played. Probably being rushed back a little soon. Could backfire if he gets picked for the 2nd test. But I suspect they'll not play him until the 3rd test.
 

The_Rey

School Boy/Girl Captain
Ridiculous to bring him back so soon. Theres another round of CC games on Sunday. Let him play that, see how he goes and get some more overs in him, then assess for Lords.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Wouldn't you want to lengthen the batting in Bumrah's absence?
They do actually need to take wickets, which won't be helped by sacrificing a bowler from an already weakened attack.

Surely Thakur has to miss out though. If nothing else, Gill clearly has little faith in him with the ball.
 

the big bambino

Cricketer Of The Year
They do actually need to take wickets, which won't be helped by sacrificing a bowler from an already weakened attack.

Surely Thakur has to miss out though. If nothing else, Gill clearly has little faith in him with the ball.
They're in a pickle. A previous poster suggested Sundar at 3. I suppose he could come in for a batsman and Reddy is benched again so they can stick with Prasidh. That still leaves the tail a little long but would give them Akashdeep, Siraj, Prasidh and Kuldeep supported by Jadeja and Sundar. Yes Thakur should go.
 

Top