capt_Luffy
Hall of Fame Member
In a Test tour comparison, you should imhoI don't discount WSC.
In a Test tour comparison, you should imhoI don't discount WSC.
Good thing I said batsman and didn't specify solely test, where I think it's fairly debateable.In a Test tour comparison, you should imho
Closer with WSC than without ImhoGood thing I said batsman and didn't specify solely test, where I think it's fairly debateable.
I disagree.Closer with WSC than without Imho
I disagree to your disagreement.I disagree.
Take your disagreement, and shove it up your arse.I disagree to your disagreement.
AgreeTake your disagreement, and shove it up your arse.
BruhTake your disagreement, and shove it up your arse.
Bruh x2Agree
Who is the best?since 1970, Sachin is also the second best touring Batsman in South Africa.
Virat KohliWho is the best?
Disappointed. You're better than this.Take your disagreement, and shove it up your arse.
Lara played stronger attacks more but averaged less than 40 against them in Aus with McGrath there.The average always looks good for Sachin, but he scored runs against weaker Australian attacks compared to Lara. Sachin is all about stats and has little impact. I can confidently say, without checking, that none of Sachin’s hundreds won India a match in Australia.
Yessince 1970, Sachin is also the second best touring Batsman in South Africa.
Batsmen don't win games really much.The average always looks good for Sachin, but he scored runs against weaker Australian attacks compared to Lara. Sachin is all about stats and has little impact. I can confidently say, without checking, that none of Sachin’s hundreds won India a match in Australia.