Hammond vs Tendulkar

[Coronis]

Who was better at the SCG?

Also fun fact - despite it being his home ground originally, by far the worst Australian ground for Bradman.

 

[capt_Luffy]

Damn..... It's tough. Hammond just imo

 

[DrWolverine]

Who was better at the SCG?

 

[Johan]

Hammond has more runs while playing 2 less innings at the SCG, this is a no brainer

 

[Thala_0710]

Hammond has more runs while playing 2 less innings at the SCG, this is a no brainer

Tendulkar did face a bit higher level of bowling imo. Although I'll go Hammond too. Just though.

 

[Johan]

Tendulkar did face a bit higher level of bowling imo. Although I'll go Hammond too. Just though.

at SCG? Can't say I agree

 

[Prince EWS]

Who was better at the SCG?

Also fun fact - despite it being his home ground originally, by far the worst Australian ground for Bradman.

Lol be ****ed if I'm gonna look up that up.

Tendulkar was a marginally better batsman so he's getting my vote.

 

[Johan]

Tendulkar was a marginally better batsman so he's getting my vote.

Question PEWS, if you have Tendulkar as a marginally better batsman than Hammond (smth I'd agree with) then who would you say is the better overall Cricketer considering Hammond's bowling/slip/captaincy (might be reaching with captaincy)?

 

[Prince EWS]

Question PEWS, if you have Tendulkar as a marginally better batsman than Hammond (smth I'd agree with) then who would you say is the better overall Cricketer considering Hammond's bowling/slip/captaincy (might be reaching with captaincy)?

Hammond.

 

[Johan]

Hammond.

Nice.

 

[Coronis]

Lol be ****ed if I'm gonna look up that up.

Tendulkar was a marginally better batsman so he's getting my vote.

Silly bot, someone already posted it in the thread.