• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ian Botham vs Barry Richards

Ian Botham vs Barry Richards


  • Total voters
    10

Johan

International Coach
Two Cricketers who are similar in the sense, that their rating by modern generations are far different to how they were rated in their primes by the people around the world. Two guys who can win you games with relative ease.
 

ma1978

International Debutant
Barry Richards played four tests. We have no idea if he was good or not really. Botham ridiculously underrated here and arguably had the greatest six year stretch of any player bar Bradman.
 

sayon basak

Cricketer Of The Year
Barry Richards played four tests. We have no idea if he was good or not really. Botham ridiculously underrated here and arguably had the greatest six year stretch of any player bar Bradman.
Sure, Botham was (clearly) better. But Barry played against some decent attacks in FC and did pretty good.
 

Johan

International Coach
agreed on the Botham ridiculously underrated part, for 55% his career he was elite ATG on par with anyone, next 25-30% he was still a very good player and regularly won games, it's just the last 15 or so percent where he became a trick to attract viewers and sell out stadiums.
 

ma1978

International Debutant
agreed on the Botham ridiculously underrated part, for 55% his career he was elite ATG on par with anyone, next 25-30% he was still a very good player and regularly won games, it's just the last 15 or so percent where he became a trick to attract viewers and sell out stadiums.
we are in violent agreement
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
FC should be taken into account when judging almost every player pre 1980
This....

I don't know how people somehow forget that. It was a sizeable part of player ratings.

Tour games were especially highly rated for players on both sides.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
we have no idea if he’s good if he didn’t play cricket. We can surmise but we have no real idea. See Graeme Hick.
There is zero correlation between him and Hick. Hick was always known as a ftb who bullied medium pacers and shrunk vs the best of competition.

That's the exact opposite of everything Richards was.

I know it's an easy comp, but not remotely a good one.

His record vs the best bowlers of his era is unmatched as is his record vs touring teams.
 

Top