• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Richard Hadlee vs Curtly Ambrose

Who was the greater bowler?

  • Richard Hadlee

    Votes: 45 67.2%
  • Curtly Ambrose

    Votes: 22 32.8%

  • Total voters
    67

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
View attachment 47380

@smash84 actually underestimated Hadlee's margin: he has 33 1/3% more POTS than Marshall who has 25% fewer POTS than Hadlee (8 is 33 1/3% bigger than 6 which is 25% smaller than 8).

Hadlee has just one POTS against SL, BTW, not two unless you were talking about the number of series played against SL in which case Hadlee, in fact, played three series against them: two Tests in 1983, three in 1984 and one in 1987 (that series was abandoned due to civil unrest).

I don't think they gave a POTS award for the 1980 NZ-WI series but if they had, Hadlee would have surely won it for his superb all-round performances:

View attachment 47381

So that makes it 9 POTS for Hadlee, putting him 50% ahead of Marshall!

Remember, you mustn't speak ill of the dead:

View attachment 47382
On MOS, Imran outdoes both Hadlee and Marshall and everyone else and no MOS against minnows and three against the WI. In the 1980s he played 16 series and was MOS in 8 of them including in WI, Aus, Ind and Eng twice.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
On MOS, Imran outdoes both Hadlee and Marshall and everyone else and no MOS against minnows and three against the WI. In the 1980s he played 16 series and was MOS in 8 of them including in WI, Aus, Ind and Eng twice.
One was for batting though
 

DrWolverine

International Vice-Captain
ChatGPT made this impressive table.
Most runs & most wickets in each test series involving Don Bradman from both the teams.
 

Sliferxxxx

State Vice-Captain
So this is it, after everything else, were down to conjecture.

I don't think isn't the basis of an argument.

Marshall was quicker than all of those gentleman and for a sustained period. He had a ridiculously condensed schedule of 5 test series, and a full county load. They didn't have a spinner to eat overs and he went all out. Yes, it would have worn on his body.

But there's nothing besides guesses at this point that would project how he would have adapted or performed.

Anyways, hope you don't take any of this personally, I do rate you as a poster.

Respect
 

Sliferxxxx

State Vice-Captain
Can we move on from this thread now, Hadlee is quite clearly rated a better bowler than Ambrose. He's not better by much but enough to make a conclusion.
 

Patience and Accuracy+Gut

State Vice-Captain
Just from seeing the list, Morris outscored Bradman in his last tour of England, 1948 series. The list seems to miss when West Indies toured here and iirc Ponsford and Bradman scored around similar runs and iirc Grimmett ran riot against those WI batsman.

From pure memory Bradman wins,

1930 Ashes
SA in Australia 31-32
1934 Ashes
1936 Ashes
1946-47 Ashes
India Series

Plus 1938 Ashes

From my memory he played some very important innings in the 1938 Ashes.Saved up the McCabe’s match and scored a ton in a very low scoring match. Man of the series for me.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Also Hutton scored more than 364 runs in that series.

Though actually, using AI to determine MOTS is not a horrible idea. (Grok, not ChatGPT)
For all the efforts I put and painstakingly determined a (sometimes two) MoTS from every 19th Century Series.
 

Top