as the resident Viv hater, even I would say the reversal of that is probably far more accurate.Viv better.
Murali greater.
Viv both better and greaterViv better.
Murali greater.
Murali both better and greater.Viv better.
Murali greater.
He isn't. He is a more flawed bowler.Murali both better and greater.
He is. He is also a more impactful bowler.He isn't. He is a more flawed bowler.
Lol no.Viv better.
Murali greater.
8540>800Lol no.
Looking at their run/wicket tally is probably not the most accurate way of assessing greatness.
800 wickets is probably equivalent to more runs than SRT.8540>800
An English spinner I presume. Similar to Anderson vs McGrath.No one is breaking 800 EVER
So a Warne level English spinnerAn English spinner I presume. Similar to Anderson vs McGrath.
Only by virtue of his home record.He is. He is also a more impactful bowler.
An English spinner I presume. Similar to Anderson vs McGrath.
*Tears off a page* Like that's ever gonna happenSo a Warne level English spinner
A total lie. Murali was ATG in England, South Africa, New Zealand, Pakistan and WI.Only by virtue of his home record.
I’m sure nobody initially thought Anderson would get that many wickets either*Tears off a page* Like that's ever gonna happen