You fundamentally are rating him lower for being the most efficient in his job...... Hope the absurdity is well communicated. If T20s creep in Tests even more and batsmen starts striking at mid 70s/80s on average; would you consider SRT as a very slow??
Not significantly. The average for top 6 bats for the top 8 teams have been rather consistent since the 70s
I think run rates have been increasing significantly over the last few years. Imo averages would be higher if batsmen were more patient. It will become the new norm though because of T20s.
That fantasy world of yours… does it have a name?
what do you think he'll average?
He’ll be lucky to average 50 after the Ashes this year
he'll retire your grandpa crew pace quaret, just wait and see.
Yeah he did so well against them in England and everybody knows they’re much better performing in England vs at home
Pre-Prime, doesn't matter.
Was averaging higher before and after the previous Ashes than he is now. So this series is more like, post Prime.
Remember, Walter Hammond failed all the Ashes at home but succeeded in Australia, Brook's the new Hammond.
Nah he’s a rare talent. Definitely a future ATG.
I have a question to ask you.
In his dreams
hating ass man
When he scores a ton against a good attack, call me.