• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Greg Chappell vs Herbert Sutcliffe

Better Batsman


  • Total voters
    14

Johan

International Coach
Sutcliffe.

Sutcliffe is easily ahead of Chappell, far superior in Ashes, more proven on difficult wickets and against spin and averages 60+ while opening.
 
Last edited:

Johan

International Coach
Do you rate Sutcliffe at top 7 or ahead of Hutton?? If no, then you aren't.
See

Coronis one day woke up, took photos of one hundred black and white Cricketers, made three categories of "love this guy", "meh" and "**** this guy". Then he took the hundred photos, shuffled them well and put one in each category/area and Sutcliffe and Hammond ended up in "love this guy" category, Hutton and Sachin ended up in the "meh" category so he's neutral to them, Viv and Compton ended up in the "**** this guy" category so he's a hater for them.

Me? I love all Cricketers, except Chanders, because Chanders sucks.

(this is a joke, don't cite me shitting on other Cricketers)
 
Last edited:

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Sutcliffe.

Sutcliffe is easily ahead of Chappell, far superior in Ashes, more proven on difficult wickets and against spin and averages 60+ while opening.
Chappell faced farrrrrrr better bowlers in far tougher conditions and an actual lbw rule that threatened batsmen.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Do you rate Sutcliffe at top 7 or ahead of Hutton?? If no, then you aren't.
Top 7? When did I ever do that?

See

Coronis one day woke up, took photos of one hundred black and white Cricketers, made three categories of "love this guy", "meh" and "**** this guy". Then he took the hundred photos, shuffled them well and put one in each category/area and Sutcliffe and Hammond ended up in "love this guy" category, Hutton and Sachin ended up in the "meh" category so he's neutral to them, Viv and Compton ended up in the "**** this guy" category so he's a hater for them.

Me? I love all Cricketers, except Chanders, because Chanders sucks.

(this is a joke, don't cite me shitting on other Cricketers)
News to me that Sachin and Viv played in the black and white era.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
8 then, same thing
Part of the elite 8. But I will say again for me Sutcliffe, Hutton and Gavaskar are all pretty much even for me. More personal preference that has me rank them in that order than anything. (in order of most black and white, or lowest SR, take your pick)
 

Johan

International Coach
another underrated statistic about Herbert Sutcliffe, before his decline where he failed with New Zealand (2 innings), West Indies (2 innings) and South Africa. Herbert Sutcliffe at the start of the iconic bodyline series, when he made his 194, was averaging 70 with the bat. Until that point

40 matches, 3839 runs @ 69.80 with 16 hundreds in 63 innings.

at the end of the Bodyline series

44 matches, 4,084 runs @ 65.87 with 16 hundreds in 70 innings.

He declined after that, though, did well in the 1934 Ashes anyway.

4 matches, 7 innings, 304 runs @ 50.67 with 3 fifties.
 

Top