• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Rahul Dravid vs Ab De Villiers

Who is better test batsmen

  • Ab devillers

    Votes: 7 25.9%
  • Rahul Dravid

    Votes: 20 74.1%

  • Total voters
    27

Narayana

U19 Cricketer
Who is better test batsmen?

Abd Averaged 40+ in all major countries.
Dravid struggled in sl,aus,sa.
 
Last edited:

Rob Wesley

U19 12th Man
Dravid.

AB batted below Smith, Amla and Kallis and that is a privilege so considering that, he would often have easier life coming to bat at 250/3.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
ABD is my 2nd favourite cricketer I saw most of the career of, but here it's Dravid. ABD just didn't played long enough.
 

Johan

International Coach
AB over him against express pace but Dravid wipes against almost everything else.
 

blackdevil95

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Dravid.

AB batted below Smith, Amla and Kallis and that is a privilege so considering that, he would often have easier life coming to bat at 250/3.
Dood. AB has the highest average in the batting collapses among SA batsmen even better than Kallis and Amla. LMAO
 

blackdevil95

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
That's good for my Root agenda, but Inzamam Ul Haq better in tough conditions than Brian Lara? bleh
Of course. There is one more link to another post in the first comment. That was analysed by another guy. Check that as well. You can see AB much above Kallis and Amla.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
If Aus score 400 and bowl out Ban or WI for 150 and 190, it will be considered as a difficult pitch. A pitch with sub 25 avg.

400 + 150 + 190 = 740 / 30


So this type of analysis is BS because if there is enough discrepancy in the quality between two sides, then the net avg could very easily end up being low.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
If Aus score 400 and bowl out Ban or WI for 150 and 190, it will be considered as a difficult pitch. A pitch with sub 25 avg.

400 + 150 + 190 = 740 / 30


So this type of analysis is BS because if there is enough discrepancy in the quality between the sides, then the net avg could very easily end up being low.
Take the last Aus/SL Test for an example. Depicts it perfectly
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
A good modification to this is to add the condition that - 'none of the innings have a total above 300 runs'.
 

Top