• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Pujara vs Samaraweera

Better test batter?


  • Total voters
    15

Fuller Pilch

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Pujara is definitely better than Mathews
Really?
Pujara was excellent in Australia but terrible in NZ and England - 2 places where Mathews was great. Angelo is the best Asian bat at coping with Southee-Boult-Wagner.

He also had more gears to put pressure on bowlers
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Nah, Mahela is easily better, but it's closer to than Mathews.
Pujara in Australia 2018-19 is a greater achievement than anything in Mahela's career as far as I'm concerned

then you got averages, Pujara 43, Mahela genuinely like 47 without minnow bashing with one having much easier era.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
Really?
Pujara was excellent in Australia but terrible in NZ and England - 2 places where Mathews was great. Angelo is the best Asian bat at coping with Southee-Boult-Wagner.

He also had more gears to put pressure on bowlers
Pujara had major limitations on bouncy/seaming tracks no doubt but his tour of England in 2018 was much tougher conditions than each time Mathews came over here and he dug out an average of 40 at no3.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Pujara in Australia 2018-19 is a greater achievement than anything in Mahela's career as far as I'm concerned
Agreed, Pujara in 2020-21 was excellent and very crucial too. But, Mahela had better career imo, was a great player of spin.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Agreed, Pujara in 2020-21 was excellent and very crucial too. But, Mahela had better career imo, was a great player of spin.
I think it's close, Pujara 43 but with his work in Australia and Mahela 47 with his ability against spin (removed his minnow bashing runs), seems compareable to me given era and all. Mahela easily better is a disservice to Pujara imho.
 

Fuller Pilch

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Pujara had major limitations on bouncy/seaming tracks no doubt but his tour of England in 2018 was much tougher conditions than each time Mathews came over here and he dug out an average of 40 at no3.
Mathews won a test series for SL in England
He batted through a whole day with Kusal Mendis to save a game (thanks to rain) against NZ.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
Agreed, Pujara in 2020-21 was excellent and very crucial too. But, Mahela had better career imo, was a great player of spin.
Pujara was also a great player of spin before he fell away. Better on turning tracks than Kohli I think. Before his decline I'd have certainly gone with CP because him and Mahela were both top drawer in Asia and Pujara's work in Australia was/is a cut above anything Mahela has in those parts.
 

Top