• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The Greater Cricketer: Viv Richards vs Shane Warne

Greater Cricketer

  • Viv

    Votes: 10 50.0%
  • Warne

    Votes: 10 50.0%

  • Total voters
    20

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Continuing the batter-bowler comparisons.

Also, who wins in a test match battle between them?
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
May seem contradictory, but while definitely ATG top tier players, their reputation exceeds reality for different reasons?

Warne isn't a top 4 player or all time and Viv seems to have avoided the drop in perception that other hight peak players haven't.
That being said, both make my at XI because Viv changed how cricket was played and in a way how batting was perceived and was close to unparalleled in his ability to swing the course of a match. He faced some of the greatest bowlers ever and never cowed to any of them.
Warne didn't reinvent spin bowling, but he sure as hell excelled at it unlike only one other. He as part as MCWarne took Australia back to dominance and his ability to win games on the last day, along with Murali brought prominence back to spin bowling.

Both had their issues, IVA's decline and Warnie's massive hole vs India and struggles vs Lara being prominent amongst them, but both were Wisden top 5 players and in their own way changed the game.

I genuinely have no idea who was greater, but Warne was more unique.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
May seem contradictory, but while definitely ATG top tier players, their reputation exceeds reality for different reasons?

Warne isn't a top 4 player or all time and Viv seems to have avoided the drop in perception that other hight peak players haven't.
That being said, both make my at XI because Viv changed how cricket was played and in a way how batting was perceived and was close to unparalleled in his ability to swing the course of a match. He faced some of the greatest bowlers ever and never cowed to any of them.
Warne didn't reinvent spin bowling, but he sure as hell excelled at it unlike only one other. He as part as MCWarne took Australia back to dominance and his ability to win games on the last day, along with Murali brought prominence back to spin bowling.

Both had their issues, IVA's decline and Warnie's massive hole vs India and struggles vs Lara being prominent amongst them, but both were Wisden top 5 players and in their own way changed the game.

I genuinely have no idea who was greater, but Warne was more unique.
In terms of reputation, Warne probably just pips over Viv.

I do think as a cricketer Viv touched levels of batting greatness no other has, and ended up with a very well rounded record. I give him the edge.
 

HouHsiaoHsien

International Debutant
Viv. Is in the absolute top tier of batsmen(not counting Bradman) and choosing between him, Tendulkar, Hobbs and Sobers is very tough. The top tier pacers(Mcgrath, Marshall, Hadlee, Imran, Steyn, Ambrose) are better than Warne. Viv has a clearly more well rounded record, and the best short term peak bar Bradman. So Viv, not easily, but by an identifiable margin
 

HouHsiaoHsien

International Debutant
Also Viv’s decline is not as big a hole as Warne’s record in Ind and WI, and against Ind in general. Even Tendulkar had an equally big decline. If Viv had gotten minnows to bash in his second peak, his average would have been like Tendulkar/Lara.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Also Viv’s decline is not as big a hole as Warne’s record in Ind and WI, and against Ind in general. Even Tendulkar had an equally big decline. If Viv had gotten minnows to bash in his second peak, his average would have been like Tendulkar/Lara.
I agree. Viv's decline is compensated for me by his higher than average peak.
 

Top