shortpitched713
Cricketer Of The Year
I've searched high and wide for this comparison, but don't find it anywhere. Think most just have Imran way higher as a batsman and overall all-rounder/cricketer, but what about just as pure bowlers?
Yes, but only for Imran.Are we allowing bottlecaps?
I agree. We must find a way to somehow remove those extraneities.Yes, but only for Imran.
Are we allowing bad SP's parentheses markup with unnecessary spaces? No, IMO.
I make my own grammar, and my own rulez .Yes, but only for Imran.
Are we allowing bad SP's parentheses markup with unnecessary spaces? No, IMO.
In my owld age I enjoy unnecessarily large fonts, extra spaces, and any other kind of trick to make text more readable.I agree. We must find a way to somehow remove those extraneities.
did you read the thread title?Pollock vs Kapil is close.
Imran vs Pollock is Imran hands down.
Bowling :
Imran - 9.5
Pollock - 8.5
Kapil - 7.5
Batting :
Imran - 5.5
Kapil - 6
Pollock - 5.5
Aside from which everything in that post is awfuldid you read the thread title?
Imran hands down the better bowler. The answer was there in my post.did you read the thread title?
I prefer self confessed to those who did so and pretend they didn't.Any consideration about 'who is better' that involves Imran needs to acknowledge he was a self-confessed cheat (ball tamperer).
Are we allowing bottlecaps?
I support this view if you both are willing to agree thatAny consideration about 'who is better' that involves Imran needs to acknowledge he was a self-confessed cheat (ball tamperer).
So you accept Bumrah > Cummins?At bowling? Sure