PlayerComparisons
International Captain
Who was better
load of tosh. Yousuf has 100s in every country other than South Africa, where he admittedly struggled. Average of 55 in England, 55 in NZ. Struggled in Aus but still scored vital runs, and cashed in at home. nothing wrong with that.Yousuf failed in the two toughest pace-orientated countries and two toughest spin-orientated countries of his era. Thorpe succeeded everywhere except South Africa. Has tough hundreds in Perth, Bridgetown, Colombo, Wellington, Trent Bridge etc. Notably good record against the finest team of his era, Australia. One 150+ score is a problem big enough for me to rate him lower than some other players with milder overseas success. Inzamam for example. Not lower than Yousuf though who was a bit of a soft runs machine minus the WI tour which was very creditable. Very good player though, better than Thorpe at cashing in and more elegant.
No of course there’s nothing wrong with cashing in. But at tough runs, he didn’t do as well as Thorpe. Averages below 35 in four countries, three of them were arguably the toughest he had to tour. I don’t incl England in that because the pitches he got there in 2006 were very flat.load of tosh. Yousuf has 100s in every country other than South Africa, where he admittedly struggled. Average of 55 in England, 55 in NZ. Struggled in Aus but still scored vital runs, and cashed in at home. nothing wrong with that.
taking away Yousuf's golden 2005/6/7 era would render his career average almost useless and wouldn't even be worthy of the debate probably. don't think that's fair.No of course there’s nothing wrong with cashing in. But at tough runs, he didn’t do as well as Thorpe. Averages below 35 in four countries, three of them were arguably the toughest he had to tour. I don’t incl England in that because the pitches he got there in 2006 were very flat.
Yousuf is better than Thorpe at cashing in but he did also have a wealth of opportunities for that.
He does have a test hundred against McGrath/Warne which is good, but contextually he wasn’t as good against them as Thorpe. I heavily respect his work against mid-2000s England but each hundred came on a road so it doesn’t really disprove my point. Very good flat tracks player which is positive in isolation. But I hold tough runs in high regard too. This isn’t patriotism too. I think Cook is overrated because he was a bit FTBish.taking away Yousuf's golden 2005/6/7 era would render his career average almost useless and wouldn't even be worthy of the debate probably. don't think that's fair.
prime Yousuf > Thorpe for me. Has a test 100 vs prime Warne and McGrath to boot too, as well as rendering an Ashes-winning English attack useless for a whole series.
i also think that Yousuf played in a Pakistani batting lineup that was constantly 2 down by the time he came in. Thorpe played in an England side that was much more solid all the way down. i think that pressure also has to count for something. If Thorpe had to constantly bail out the top order and also average 50 he would be rated much more highly.He does have a test hundred against McGrath/Warne which is good, but contextually he wasn’t as good against them as Thorpe. I heavily respect his work against mid-2000s England but each hundred came on a road so it doesn’t really disprove my point. Very good flat tracks player which is positive in isolation. But I hold tough runs in high regard too. This isn’t patriotism too. I think Cook is overrated because he was a bit FTBish.
Don’t agree there. I haven’t mentioned that Thorpe’s feats came in a weak England side during most of his career because Yousuf didn’t play for a very strong side but Thorpe had a ‘fireman’ nickname because he had to steady the ship a lot. Averages very highly in Tests where he came in without good runs on the board.i also think that Yousuf played in a Pakistani batting lineup that was constantly 2 down by the time he came in. Thorpe played in an England side that was much more solid all the way down. i think that pressure also has to count for something. If Thorpe had to constantly bail out the top order and also average 50 he would be rated much more highly.
i think a more appropriate comparison would be Thorpe vs Misbah ul Haq.Don’t agree there. I haven’t mentioned that Thorpe’s feats came in a weak England side during most of his career because Yousuf didn’t play for a very strong side but Thorpe had a ‘fireman’ nickname because he had to steady the ship a lot. Averages very highly in Tests where he came in without good runs on the board.
i'd rather have Nasser Hussain and Michael Atherton ahead of me than salman butt and imran farhat.Don’t agree there. I haven’t mentioned that Thorpe’s feats came in a weak England side during most of his career because Yousuf didn’t play for a very strong side but Thorpe had a ‘fireman’ nickname because he had to steady the ship a lot. Averages very highly in Tests where he came in without good runs on the board.
Yeah he did also play in the same middle order as Inzamam-Ul-Haq and Younis Khan a lot of the time. Alec Stewart was the best bat Thorpe played with if we’re talking a good chunk of his career. Swings and roundabouts.i'd rather have Nasser Hussain and Michael Atherton ahead of me than salman butt and imran farhat.
i think a better statistic for us to discriminate who was in tougher situations would be average team score when entered the wicket.Batting averages of their top sevens over the course of their careers @slowfinger
Yousuf: 36.81
Thorpe: 35.06
a better statistic stillwould be average time in innings (over wise) when entering the inningsBatting averages of their top sevens over the course of their careers @slowfinger
Yousuf: 36.81
Thorpe: 35.06
I will try to find that out but there is also the fact Thorpe played 64% of his career in a bowling era compared to 29% for Yousuf. Thorpe played a very high percentage of his innings against better than median attacks and it’s fair to say he delivered against them.i think a better statistic for us to discriminate who was in tougher situations would be average team score when entered the wicket.
if we take only the matches Yousuf batted at his favoured 4 vs Thorpe at his favoured 5 then I think it makes sense to do by score.I will try to find that out but there is also the fact Thorpe played 64% of his career in a bowling era compared to 29% for Yousuf. Thorpe played a very high percentage of his innings against better than median attacks and it’s fair to say he delivered against them.
Edit: Over average would be harder to find and think score would also be better. Overs are less relevant in batsman-friendly conditions. At least score-wise there’s the pressure aspect and it relates more to batting support and batting platform that we were discussing.
I’ll try and do that tomorrow if I get time.if we take only the matches Yousuf batted at his favoured 4 vs Thorpe at his favoured 5 then I think it makes sense to do by score.