• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ravindra Jadeja vs Saqlain Mushtaq

Who was the better test bowler?


  • Total voters
    38

Sunil1z

International Vice-Captain
If Saqlain is as good as Jadeja because home wickets , then is Rishabh Pant better Test bat than Babar Azam ?
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Only 4 spinners have taken over 10 wickets in all matches involving Jadeja in WEANS and all of them average over 30. Substantiates the fact I have said above on boards preparing pitches negating spin in the matches involving him.
Wow so Eng/NZ boards suddenly discovered how to neutralize foreign spinners when the feared Jadeja came around? Would have helped them when Murali and Warne were ripping them to shreds.
 

Sunil1z

International Vice-Captain
Wow so Eng/NZ boards suddenly discovered how to neutralize foreign spinners when the feared Jadeja came around? Would have helped them when Murali and Warne were ripping them to shreds.
Even Pakistan dropped Yasir” Better than Ashwin “ Shah while playing in NZ . Do you even watch matches ?
 

Bolo.

International Captain
People really need to stop equivocating conditions that are good for batting with good for bowling of all types. It's more appropriate to talk about bowling conditions being good for a bowler of a particular type than claiming it as flat/spicy when assessing a bowler (although obviously the latter distinction exists as well, and should be taken into account).
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
People really need to stop equivocating conditions that are good for batting with good for bowling of all types. It's more appropriate to talk about bowling conditions being good for a bowler of a particular type than claiming it as flat/spicy when assessing a bowler (although obviously the latter distinction exists as well, and should be taken into account).
Never.

Sangakkara batted in the easiest conditions of his time and Murali bowled on the most helpful wickets of his time. This is undisputed CW fact.
 

Kenneth Viljoen

International Regular
It's not a good comparison in my opinion , Saqlain Mushtaq was a specialist bowler and Ravindra Jadeja is a genuine all rounder, bowling dynamics definitely are impacted when it's not the only major responsibility of a cricketer for a Test match which has happened to Jadeja on many occasions.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Only 4 spinners have taken over 10 wickets in all matches involving Jadeja in WEANS and all of them average over 30. Substantiates the fact I have said above on boards preparing pitches negating spin in the matches involving him.
Yeah this is definitely true. Particularly in the case of NZ/ SA where they seem to actively ensure that pitches don't spin. England still provides balanced pitches tho.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Then why would teams prepare green top?
Many SENA teams prepare wickets that gives them best chance of winning and in turn can also neutralise spin bowling .
You've been saying **** like this for years and never seem to get it when it's explained to you

Not every pitch is made to suit someone. Most of the time that's just how the soil/conditions dictate it to turn out. Pitch doctoring definitely happens, but it's not the norm in most places. It's rare for a SENA team to prepare a pitch to negate spin bowling, I can't recall it ever happening in a game I've seen though I'm sure it probably has. I don't follow NZ test cricket (obviously, yawn) so maybe it's happened there I don't know.
 

_00_deathscar

International Regular
Jadeja wins more matches for India than Saqlain did for Pakistan

Saqlain was an amazing ODI bowler, a good test bowler too but think he was slightly overrated in the format.

Having said that it is close - Jadeja isn’t some ATG spinner.
 

Sunil1z

International Vice-Captain
You've been saying **** like this for years and never seem to get it when it's explained to you

Not every pitch is made to suit someone. Most of the time that's just how the soil/conditions dictate it to turn out. Pitch doctoring definitely happens, but it's not the norm in most places. It's rare for a SENA team to prepare a pitch to negate spin bowling, I can't recall it ever happening in a game I've seen though I'm sure it probably has. I don't follow NZ test cricket (obviously, yawn) so maybe it's happened there I don't know.
When you prepare green tops 95% of spinners are automatically neutralised unless you are Murali/ Warne .

The thing is even dust bowls aid reverse swing so fast bowlers don’t get completely neutralised . Whereas on green tops spin definitely gets neutralised.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
When you prepare green tops in 95% of spinners are automatically neutralised unless you are Murali/ Warne .

The thing is even dust bowls aid reverse swing so fast bowlers don’t get completely neutralised . Whereas on green tops spin definitely gets neutralised.
I don't think so. Spinners are more neutralised on a flat-hard Australian road than on a green top. The difference is on a green top spinners are less useful when compared to seam bowling. It's not that spin is neutralised, it's that seam bowling is so effective that you wouldn't really bowl a spinner when you could bowl a seamer.

But regardless the point is most of the time you get a green wicket it's not with the express purpose of combating spin bowling
 

Top