*Official* Pro-Wrestling Thread II

[OverratedSanity]

How long can they keep doing this cowardly heel shtick? It's running thin as it stands.

edit:I mean Seth.

It's fine but he really needs a proper long feud. Thought the Brock thing could be awesome but all we got was a 15 minute match.

I find it weird how WWE knows how to handle Rollins vs Ambrose, which has consistently been enjoyable as hell, but otherwise, they don't really know who to face off against those two.

 

[GIMH]

How long can they keep doing this cowardly heel shtick? It's running thin as it stands.

edit:I mean Seth.

Hmmm not seen the last month of Raw but I think it's working just fine. Reminds me of Flair. Runs away, hides, gets the job done (and has quality matches).

Haven't thought too deeply into this though so wouldn't say I feel all that strongly

 

[OverratedSanity]

Tbf to him, it's actually how seriously the rest of the world takes them that bugs me, and the fact that nearly anyone who rates a wrestling match used the same system. Bah

Yeah it's silly. I find it weird how the term "5-star match" basically now only means those matches rated 5 stars by Meltzer on Wrestling Observer. Never gave a single Daniel Bryan match 5 stars even though he has plenty worthy of that rating.

Atleast he loves Flair and Misawa to death though, so I can't hate him.

 

[Spikey]

Rollins V Cena was good when it happened before, and between them they've been amongst the wrestlers of the year, IMO. I'm up for it.

no idea how the crowd will react though.

Also, Meltzer is a **** **** **** **** and athlai made a bloody great post a few up from this

nah he's a big poopy face and his post was full of strawman

 

[Jono]

huge GIMP wahhh

 

[Spikey]

so typical of him to try to bury meltzer like this

 

[GIMH]

huge GIMP wahhh

????????

 

[Jono]

hey, nothing wrong with a good wahh. We all have them.

 

[GIMH]

Yeah it's silly. I find it weird how the term "5-star match" basically now only means those matches rated 5 stars by Meltzer on Wrestling Observer. Never gave a single Daniel Bryan match 5 stars even though he has plenty worthy of that rating.

Atleast he loves Flair and Misawa to death though, so I can't hate him.

He went 14 years without giving a maximum to a WWE match.

Taker-Shawn HIAC (which is the ****in bomb but not as good as their Mania 25 effort, and perhaps on par with Mania 26, imho) to that Cena-Punk match

 

[GIMH]

hey, nothing wrong with a good wahh. We all have them.

?

 

[Jono]

He went 14 years without giving a maximum to a WWE match.

Taker-Shawn HIAC (which is the ****in bomb but not as good as their Mania 25 effort, and perhaps on par with Mania 26, imho) to that Cena-Punk match

Scott Steiner vs. Trips at Rumble 2003 was robbed.

 

[Spikey]

who is trips

 

[Athlai]

Why do the Matardores and Lucha Dragons suck so much?

 

[Jono]

who is trips

����������������

 

[Jono]

trying to do the GIMP icons but not working. wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

 

[GIMH]

Why do the Matardores and Lucha Dragons suck so much?

Matadores do but Lucha Dragons are good

 

[GIMH]

trying to do the GIMP icons but not working. wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

 

[OverratedSanity]

Why do the Matardores and Lucha Dragons suck so much?

Kalisto is awesome.

 

[sledger]

I don't mind Meltzer tbh. As others have alluded to, he's fine if you don't take all of what he says too seriously. Plenty of flaws with his rating system, but when he gives a match a top rating you can pretty much bet your mortgage on it being a great watch.

 

[duffer]

Ok I've read his name a few times but who is Kevin Dunn and what does he do?