I've just re-read what I wrote and I seemed to mention 'all year' at least twice...I don't think focusing on my first sentence (which was totally serious by the way) sums up what I said.
And Tiger probably would be winning a lot more titles if he played more tournaments. But wouldn't most of the top golfers? The only way we'd really find out is if they all played all of the tournaments...and then we'd have a year full of the equivalent of major tournaments. I think it's common sense to suggest more weight is placed on the majors, but not winning one doesn't mean you haven't had a good year.
I didn't think what Social suggested was that ridiculous to be honest.