Nah.This could well have been discussed before but anyway.....
I listen to a sports radio show each morning on the way to work and one of the presenters is always banging on about how they should play test matches over 4 days in an attempt to revitalise the format. He usually gets a few laughs as the other presenters mock him but does he have a point? Would this be a good idea?
Me, I wouldn’t be opposed to the idea as the games usually seem to be won before or very early on the 5th day. When a 5th day is required the crowd is basically non-existent. If they were going to move to 4 days I wouldn’t want the actual length of play to be shorter though. Add an extra session into each days play. Perhaps have the extra session in the evening to capture the appeal of the day night tests as well. I suspect the crowd would be at least as big as the current 5 day format with the benefit of likely increased F&B revenue as the spectators spend more time feeding their faces and getting boozed.
Over to the forum for thoughts.
Sadly i was talking with my work mate about the series and he's obviously not a big cricket fan but said day 5 of SCG test was so boring he turned off the tv. That days play put him off watching the 4th test. Test cricket will always be a niche sport I think.Definitely not. The 5th days of both Sydney and the Gabba were riveting viewing.
Your workmate is an idiot. He's probably a trump supporter his opinions are that bad.Sadly i was talking with my work mate about the series and he's obviously not a big cricket fan but said day 5 of SCG test was so boring he turned off the tv. That days play put him off watching the 4th test. Test cricket will always be a niche sport I think.