kiwiviktor81
International Debutant
Do keep up. I've long since accepted the argument that Bevan's natural strike rate was closer to 80 and therefore that I'd pick him over Elliott in the NZ side.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Who would you rather have come in at No. 6 for your team with 15 overs to go?
- Thread starter kiwiviktor81
- Start date
kiwiviktor81
International Debutant
There have been few intelligent responses to this thread, but this post is a good one.
Cabinet96
Global Moderator
Wrong. He got dropped because he went 18 months without a 50, and 30 months without a ton.
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Haha good to see that you took it in the spirit it was intended.
Grumpy probably would have taken it really seriously and reported me for insulting him.
kiwiviktor81
International Debutant
You'd be doing really well to wind me up on here. I really enjoy the debates but am not emotionally invested in them. I actually don't think I've reported anyone in my entire life, half of which has been on internet forums of some kind.Haha good to see that you took it in the spirit it was intended.
Grumpy probably would have taken it really seriously and reported me for insulting him.