View Poll Results: Who is the best English quick since Willis/Botham?

Voters
33. You may not vote on this poll
  • Jimmy Anderson

    24 72.73%
  • Darren Gough

    2 6.06%
  • Angus Fraser

    1 3.03%
  • Andrew Flintoff

    1 3.03%
  • Andy Caddick

    1 3.03%
  • Simon Jones

    1 3.03%
  • Steve Harmison

    1 3.03%
  • Matthew Hoggard

    1 3.03%
  • Stuart Broad

    0 0%
  • Other

    1 3.03%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 44 of 44
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Best English fast bowler since Botham/Willis?

  1. #31
    U19 Debutant Esperance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    *
    Posts
    303
    doesnt anderson have the worst economy rate for a world cup england bowler?
    You take my pawn, I take your rook. You take my bishop, I take your queen. You take my knight, I buy Mayfair. Because while you were busy playing chess, I've been playing Monopoly the entire time.

  2. #32
    International Coach HeathDavisSpeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Rummaging through Iain O'Brien's dustbins.
    Posts
    14,306
    Quote Originally Posted by fredfertang View Post
    I suppose it must be the Burnley Express, but he's only marginally better than Glen Chapple, who has to be the most criminally under selected quick in history - in addition I'm always amazed how quickly folk have forgotten how good Steve Harmison was in the early to mid noughties
    **** off. Chapple is a ****.

    Anyway, Neil Foster for me. A wonderful bowler whose regular injury problems meant that his record fails to show his true quality.
    >>>>>>WHHOOOOOOOOOSHHHHHHH>>>>>>
    Fascist Dictator of the Heath Davis Appreciation Society
    Supporting Petone's Finest since the very start - Iain O'Brien
    Adam Wheater - Another batsman off the Essex production line
    Also Supporting the All Time #1 Batsman of All Time Ever - Jacques Kallis and the much maligned Peter Siddle.


    Vimes tells it how it is:
    Quote Originally Posted by Samuel_Vimes View Post
    Heath worryingly quick.

  3. #33
    International Coach grecian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Oh, God, I'm bored. Might as well be listening to Genesis
    Posts
    14,955
    Quote Originally Posted by HeathDavisSpeed View Post
    **** off. Chapple is a ****.

    Anyway, Neil Foster for me. A wonderful bowler whose regular injury problems meant that his record fails to show his true quality.
    Foster's career over-lapped with those two though, but yeah, could have been a great but for injury. Common theme here.
    Do I contradict myself?
    Very well then I contradict myself,
    (I am large, I contain multitudes.
    Walt Whitman

  4. #34
    U19 Debutant Biryani Pillow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    I don't know, but its dark!!!!!
    Posts
    305
    Quote Originally Posted by fredfertang View Post
    I suppose it must be the Burnley Express, but he's only marginally better than Glen Chapple, who has to be the most criminally under selected quick in history - in addition I'm always amazed how quickly folk have forgotten how good Steve Harmison was in the early to mid noughties


    No.

    Quote Originally Posted by flibbertyjibber View Post
    Would have been Fraser without the hip injury that ruined his career, still had a good one despite it but lost at least a yard after it.
    Quote Originally Posted by ImpatientLime View Post
    I loved Gus but wasn't he very reliant on conditions? If the ball didn't move off the deck he didn't look all that threatening.
    The first post on Fraser is true. The second is not.

    The injury (which would probably have resolved itself quickly had he not been made to play in aa meaningless ODI on the 1991 tour) robbed him of his extra nip and bounce. This was the difference between him being a bowler who was good in the right conditions but not hard to play on a flat pitch and, as he was before the injury, solid in all condition and very difficult if conditions gave him any help.

    I recall him bowling against a strong Indian batting line up in 1990 on some very flat pitches and they still found him a challenge.

    Jones had the potential. He bowled well in his 1st Test - but was injured during it. In 2005 he had a very good one and a half matches before being injured at Trent Bridge. Not really enough to go on.

    Foster always looked promising but I never thought that promise was at all fulfilled. Not sure he had the heart required either. He was definetly one who looked easy to play if conditions were against him.

    I always thought Dominic Cork would have been a great support seamer - the sort of role that Hoggard had - but not an attack spearhead.
    Last edited by Biryani Pillow; 25-07-2013 at 03:15 AM.


  5. #35
    Cricketer Of The Year Hurricane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Stopping the AFL spreading to NZ
    Posts
    9,674
    Flintoff bowled like a fast bowler - and cricinfo lists him as Right arm Fast.

    Anderson is listed as fast medium and uses swing and movement to get his wickets.

    Therefore if the thread title had said who is the best seamer since Botham and Willis you would vote for Anderson. But in terms of thinking like a fast bowler and bowling with menace it was Flintoff.

    I think I am just being a contrarian here - but that is how I voted in the poll.
    Last edited by Hurricane; 25-07-2013 at 04:04 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by HeathDavisSpeed View Post
    I got great enjoyment in going to the game and shouting "WHY THE **** ISN'T THIS GAME BEING PLAYED AT THE BASIN?!>!?!?" to reasonably significant cheers from the sparse crowd
    Proudly against the bring back Bennett movement since he is injury prone and won't last 5 days.

  6. #36
    International Coach grecian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Oh, God, I'm bored. Might as well be listening to Genesis
    Posts
    14,955
    Quote Originally Posted by Hurricane View Post
    Flintoff bowled like a fast bowler - and cricinfo lists him as Right arm Fast.

    Anderson is listed as fast medium and uses swing and movement to get his wickets.

    Therefore if the thread title and had said who is the best seamer since Botham and Willis you would vote for Anderson. But in terms of thinking like a fast bowler and blowing with menace it was Flintoff.

    I think I am just being a contrarian here - but that is how I voted in the poll.
    Yeah, but the poll is for "quick", it's all very confusing.

  7. #37
    U19 Debutant Biryani Pillow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    I don't know, but its dark!!!!!
    Posts
    305
    Anderson is generally in the 86-88mph range - non English bowlers in that range (and often below) are frequently rated 'fast'. English bowlers who are frequently over 90mph might get classified 'fast', but not always.
    Last edited by Biryani Pillow; 25-07-2013 at 05:57 AM.

  8. #38
    Cricket Spectator
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    leeds
    Posts
    10
    The stats are in Andersons favour already and he''s nowhere near finished. No contest

  9. #39
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Jason Koumas is having a party
    Posts
    48,074
    If Jones and Tremlett weren't made of glass we'd clearly have dominated cricket for at least 50 years

  10. #40
    International Captain wellAlbidarned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    away from the palms
    Posts
    6,306
    Pretty surprised that I was the first vote for Gough. Dat action.
    Exit pursuing a beer

  11. #41
    Hall of Fame Member superkingdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    DRS Box
    Posts
    18,895
    People's opinions of Gough are clouded by him reminding us every day how much of a nob he is
    Dave Mohammed >>>> You

  12. #42
    Cricket Web Staff Member fredfertang's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Cloud Cuckoo Land
    Posts
    11,812
    Quote Originally Posted by superkingdave View Post
    People's opinions of Gough are clouded by him reminding us every day how much of a nob he is
    Surprised Adrian Durham is prepared to work with him tbh - he wasn't too bad when he started but he has become a caricature of himself as time has passed

  13. #43
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Jason Koumas is having a party
    Posts
    48,074
    It staggers me that that man even has opinions, let alone get paid to share them.

  14. #44
    Cricket Web Staff Member fredfertang's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Cloud Cuckoo Land
    Posts
    11,812
    Quote Originally Posted by GIMH View Post
    It staggers me that that man even has opinions, let alone get paid to share them.
    Half the problem with him is that he doesn't - it's patently obvious that his "opinions" are what his producer and/or Durham tells him they are

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Fast Bowler's fast Bowlers
    By SJS in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 283
    Last Post: 22-09-2012, 08:31 PM
  2. Replies: 128
    Last Post: 21-11-2011, 02:43 AM
  3. Greatest English fast bowler ever ?
    By Salamuddin in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 137
    Last Post: 29-12-2007, 04:12 PM
  4. BEst fast Bowler of 90's?
    By Bouncer in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 121
    Last Post: 15-12-2004, 02:20 PM
  5. Botham for English Coach
    By The Argonaut in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-12-2002, 12:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •