Last edited by Son Of Coco; 22-11-2012 at 05:08 AM.
R.I.P Craigos, you were a champion bloke. One of the best
R.I.P Fardin 'Bob' Qayyumi
Member of the Church of the Holy Glenn McGrath
"How about you do something contstructive in this forum for once and not fill the forum with ****. You offer nothing." - theegyptian.
"There's more chance of SoC making a good post than Smith averaging 99.95." - Furball
"**** you're such a **** poster." - Furball
He once drew an analogy between how much I death-rode Symonds's Test career and how he had felt about Michael Clarke a couple of years earlier when he was first forging his way into Test cricket. I often think of how hard he must be taking it when Clarke plays well, because I can't comprehend how much of a cricket grump I'd be if Symonds's Test career turned out like Clarke's.
Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since Dec '09
Rejecting 'selection deontology' since Mar '15
Moeen is a perfectly fine bowler FFS
Tahir was so bad. I mean, PEWS has gone way OTT today but he's right when it comes to Tahir, he was absolutely abysmal. Couldn't get through an over without a long hop or a full toss. Not just the batting either - bowled a ****load of pies post-tea which got smacked to fielders.
Originally Posted by Peter Mooresforever 63*
srsly, there would be some people who couldn't understand how hard it is to play that shot. On drive is the hardest to play in cricket. **** he nailed it.
Brad McNamara @bbuzzmc
Will say this once and then nothing else. Defamation laws quite clear in Aus.be careful.
Yeah Tahir has bowled as bad as I've ever seen a visiting spinner.
In fact, it's not even a competition. Worst by miles. Looked absolutely 2nd grade standard. And that's no way an exaggeration.
Well, he got one thing spot on: they've moved away from containing alright.
Clarke's 150 drive reminds me of Blewett's shot to bring up his 100 when he made that 214. click link for the shot.
1997 South Africa vs Australia TEST SERIES REVIEW - YouTube
Boje wasn't what I'd call a containing type bowler anyway; he was an attacking left arm spinner. He was just usually quite poor. Paul Harris - now there's a containing bowler.
I mean, when you get comfortably outbowled by a part-timer on debut whose first delivery was literally put into a construction site, that says a bit
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)