Barry Richards is hurt by two things in the above analysis - firstly that one-off match in NZ which wasn't counted in the original figures, in which he scored 6 & 5.Brilliant stuff, Sean! The sharp decline in Barry's average is shocking though. I knew it would fall from 73 but I was under the impression that he the was the best batsman alongside Chappel in WSC and thought it would be somewhere around the 65-mark overall.
His overall average is still well above 50+ against some great bowling. A reversion to mean, but does make one question the sometime assumption that he was a clear class ahead of other greats. And with what is still a very small sample size, a couple of poor matches, as mentioned above, will affect it noticeably.Brilliant stuff, Sean! The sharp decline in Barry's average is shocking though. I knew it would fall from 73 but I was under the impression that he the was the best batsman alongside Chappel in WSC and thought it would be somewhere around the 65-mark overall.
Those aren't legal and I think we all know why.
He spins urgh
Yep, I've mentioned it on here before but even with a larger sample size Graeme Pollock suffers too. He didn't play WSC but he did play in the two RoW series in 1970 and 71/72 with only moderate success. If those matches are included then his career average drops from 60.97 to 54.30.His overall average is still well above 50+ against some great bowling. A reversion to mean, but does make one question the sometime assumption that he was a clear class ahead of other greats. And with what is still a very small sample size, a couple of poor matches, as mentioned above, will affect it noticeably.
Thats a surprise. I'm always under the assumption that pollock played well in those matches. Nonetheless He and sobers played amazingly during one innings. Pollock is a too good a batsman to drop his average around 5 runs with in a series.Yep, I've mentioned it on here before but even with a larger sample size Graeme Pollock suffers too. He didn't play WSC but he did play in the two RoW series in 1970 and 71/72 with only moderate success. If those matches are included then his career average drops from 60.97 to 54.30.
It was two series to be fair - 8 Tests overall. You're right, he played one superb innings in partnership with Sobers during that 1970 RoW series, but his overall record over the two series was 459 runs at 35.30.Thats a surprise. I'm always under the assumption that pollock played well in those matches. Nonetheless He and sobers played amazingly during one innings. Pollock is a too good a batsman to drop his average around 5 runs with in a series.
Worth a look : YouTube - Cmon Aussie Cmon - 1978 WSC Advert
I'm guessing that's against the bunch of has-beens bowling for Gooch's lot in 1982? A bit generous to Pollock imo.It was two series to be fair - 8 Tests overall. You're right, he played one superb innings in partnership with Sobers during that 1970 RoW series, but his overall record over the two series was 459 runs at 35.30.
I suppose one could argue that if you're including the RoW series you could also include the Rebel series - also played as unofficial Tests. I don't remember exactly but I crunched the numbers on this one and if those Rebel tours are included then Pollock's record goes back up over 57.
Official Tests: 93 matches, 8,032 runs at 57.78 and 235 wickets at 34.03How is Sobers' batting and bowling records including those RoW games?
WAGIncluding RoW: 103 matches, 8,961 runs at 58.18 and 265 wickets at 33.53.