That is to low for Hopes, and I would rather Hopes in the side over White for what he adds with the ball. I would open with Hopes, as he offers much more to the team and saves a batting spot for White lower in the order.Oh indeed, but that doesn't mean I can't think a bowler would add more to the side in his place. Currently the bottom seven reads:
7. White
8. Hopes
9. Lee
10. Johnson
11. Bracken
The tail does not need to be that strong at the expense of a genuine fourth bowling option. Hopes at 7, Lee at 8 and Johnson at 9 is perfectly acceptable - if fact I'd still say it was strong.
I dont think either Ponting or Hayden will retire before the world cup... and even if they do (or ponting does... more importantly) there will be a lot of stuff that has occured as i recn he will play for a further 5 years if hes good enough (which he should be as he's class)That is to low for Hopes, and I would rather Hopes in the side over White for what he adds with the ball. I would open with Hopes, as he offers much more to the team and saves a batting spot for White lower in the order.
Johnson needs to be dropped imo, for either Bollinger or Noffke. Our team doesn't need the extra batting Noffke needs, we need him as a bowler. Bollinger fits this role better, thus fitting him into the team better.
1. Hopes
2. Watson
3. Katich
4. Clarke (c)
5. Hussey
6. Haddin (wk)
7. White (vc)
8.Noffke
9.Lee
10. Hauritz
11. Bollinger
I feel we need a team like this in a few years (when Punter and Haydos retire). Everyone in this team can bat, except Bollinger. We can bat all the way down, and when our bats fire, we would be very capable of posting 500+ scores in test, and 300+ in OD.
Hopes opening the Tests is a horrible idea. Watson as well.1. Hopes
2. Watson
3. Katich
4. Clarke (c)
5. Hussey
6. Haddin (wk)
7. White (vc)
8.Noffke
9.Lee
10. Hauritz
11. Bollinger
White's basically in as a "like-for-like" Symonds replacement though isn't he?Oh indeed, but that doesn't mean I can't think a bowler would add more to the side in his place. Currently the bottom seven reads:
7. White
8. Hopes
9. Lee
10. Johnson
11. Bracken
The tail does not need to be that strong at the expense of a genuine fourth bowling option. Hopes at 7, Lee at 8 and Johnson at 9 is perfectly acceptable - if fact I'd still say it was strong.
That is a one day team. I was feeling tired when I posted that, and was not thinking straight.Hopes opening the Tests is a horrible idea. Watson as well.
Lee won't be around once Ponting and Clark go either.
Where's Jaques and Marsh?
Hauritz???
White???
It wouldn't be temporary though - I'd play Clark at full strength as well. Not that it's relevant anyway: if replacing a bowler with a batsman temporarily was strangely the best option for the balance of the team, I'd still do it in a heartbeat.Would seem a bit odd to replace a batsman with a bowler on a temporary basis.
Yeah, that's fine, but not when the same is true of your fourth bowler. Hopes isn't good enough to play a specialist bowler IMO but he adds more to the team as an allrounder than White. So in effect I'd be dropping Hopes for Clark and then White for Hopes in the current team... and then Hopes for Symonds when Symonds returned.Australia's fifth bowler has usually been a mix of part-timers - and given the fact that teams are often in disarray when they come on, it doesn't get punished like it should quite often.
I don't think Hopes is good enough to play as a specialist bowler either, but there's no arguing with his recent figures. From the First ODI in India to the Second ODI in West Indies he's conceded 3.74-an-over and averaged 26.83. That is seriously impressive. Something Clark has never managed. And until Hopes' performance drops-off, he (especially with his batting) has a far stronger case for selection than Clark.It wouldn't be temporary though - I'd play Clark at full strength as well. Not that it's relevant anyway: if replacing a bowler with a batsman temporarily was strangely the best option for the balance of the team, I'd still do it in a heartbeat.
Yeah, that's fine, but not when the same is true of your fourth bowler. Hopes isn't good enough to play a specialist bowler IMO but he adds more to the team as an allrounder than White. So in effect I'd be dropping Hopes for Clark and then White for Hopes in the current team... and then Hopes for Symonds when Symonds returned.