Ultimate number "2"of 2007 (Performances in the ODIs and the tests)

[grecian]

Oh and BTW, if you reject the result of Eng-pak, for spurious reasons, I reject the result of Pak-Eng, for the reason that 3 cheating bowlers started the first test match

England drew in India, thats by far the most important match-up recently here.

 

[FRAZ]

Oh and BTW, if you reject the result of Eng-pak, for spurious reasons, I reject the result of Pak-Eng, for the reason that 3 cheating bowlers started the first test match

England drew in India, thats by far the most important match-up recently here.

hahahaha good try !!
And for Neil it might be a jelly with comparison to a statement saying "This hair issue is just like the 1965 war b/w Pak and Ind) ..
Bless ya !

 

[grecian]

Not really trying to wind you up Fraz, just pointing out the futility of ruling out results, because you don't like the officiating.

Oh and you seem to like the ICC rankings, so why your disparity with one nation.

 

[FRAZ]

Not really trying to wind you up Fraz, just pointing out the futility of ruling out results, because you don't like the officiating.

You see ,you will keep on percieving me as a Pakistani fan , Ask your heart , right ????? And please be truthful . I was talking about Indians there and you had to drag in a guy who had a chuking problem in a match after being released and was banned later on and then two individuals found positive (so did rudseski ) with a level of 14 % where legal limit is 8 % in Asian men and 6% in others !!! And you were clearly being sarcastic and I don't want to get into any stupid you this me that argument ! I was talking Indians there and not Pakistanis mind ya !!!

 

[grecian]

You see ,you will keep on percieving me as a Pakistani fan , Ask your heart , right ????? And please be truthful . I was talking about Indians there and you had to drag in a guy who had a chuking problem in a match after being released and was banned later on and then two individuals found positive (so did rudseski ) with a level of 14 % where legal limit is 8 % in Asian men and 6% in others !!! And you were clearly being sarcastic and I don't want to get into any stupid you this me that argument ! I was talking Indians there and not Pakistanis mind ya !!!

Part of your original post in this thread mentions that you discount that series. This seems to be one of your tenuous reasons to rank England sixth in tests. This seems utterly irrational, in every way. You still haven't explained how 5 nations will be ahead of us, I give you Australia. We've beaten South Africa home and away, same with West Indies, pakistan draw, New zealand, nah.


Ho-hum....

 

[Jono]

Oh and BTW, if you reject the result of Eng-pak, for spurious reasons, I reject the result of Pak-Eng, for the reason that 3 cheating bowlers started the first test match

Asif didn't play against England in the Pakistan home series

 

[grecian]

Asif didn't play against England in the Pakistan home series

Afridi

 

[Jono]

Generous calling him a bowler in tests, but true

 

[nightprowler10]

Afridi didn't play in the first test. Only the second one.

 

[FRAZ]

Afridi didn't play in the first test. Only the second one.

I forgot that . And actualy he plays or not , it doesn't make much of a difference now a days !