CW Survivor WEEK TWO - W. Younis is off the cricket pitch!

[devdas]

Originally posted by Rik
Hmmmm it could be that someone just kept on voting for McGrath...we need to sort out a way of making it so that one person can only vote once...its wierd I sometimes have to vote again when I come onto a poll just to see the result...

It doesn't work that back, one can only vote once, nothing hanky panky about it. I tried to do that, first i voted for Donald and then tried to vote for Garner as i thought i made a mistake initially, but it didn't allowed me to vote again.

 

[marc71178]

It's strange, some polls do allow multiple voting, but some don't seem to - a bit hit and miss in my view.

 

[royGilchrist]

Paid, U never got back to me about S Pollock and Imran Khan not being included in this list. Their stats (with ur method) are better than some of the others on this list.

 

[Paid The Umpire]

I have voted multiple times. But always for different people.

What it is doing it is only letting each IP Address vote once.

 

[Paid The Umpire]

Originally posted by royGilchrist
Paid, U never got back to me about S Pollock and Imran Khan not being included in this list. Their stats (with ur method) are better than some of the others on this list.

S. Pollock (94.04) - not a true openning bowler
I. Khan (didn't get 200 wickets)

 

[royGilchrist]

Are you kidding me!!!

If u made a mistake Paid its no big deal, infact its not even a mistake, u just overlooked two great bowlers.

Anyways, Imran Khan did not take 200 wickets????? I am not sure what to say about that one, maybe u werent born when he was bowling. He took more wickets than Lillee, 362 to be precise.

And Shaun Pollock not a opening bowler. That is about the lamest excuse I have ever heard. First of all the criteria was never openeing bowlers, but great fast bowlers (I can quote u on that one). Secondly, since when has Garner been an opening bowler, he was primarily a first change. And thirdly and more importantly, Pollock is an excellent opening bowler, and has been a large part of his career.

I am not saying u should include these two in the poll now, its no big deal just a poll, but please quit the excuses.

 

[OZOZ]

[/quote]

I. Khan (didn't get 200 wickets)

[/quote]

As a matter of fact, Imran got much more than 200 wkts in both formats of cricket, gets ur facts right buddy!


[/quote]

S. Pollock (94.04) - not a true openning bowler

[/quote]


Atleast these days he's opening the attack.Even Marshall wasn't an opening bowler for Windies for quite some time, doesn't mean he wasn't a great bowler!


[Edited on 16/10/2002 by OZOZ]

 

[Gotchya]

Paid : if you dont come up with good enough reasons for your omissions then i guess the purpose of this poll has already died

[Edited on 16/10/2002 by Gotchya]

 

[Anil]

Originally posted by Paid The Umpire

Originally posted by royGilchrist
Paid, U never got back to me about S Pollock and Imran Khan not being included in this list. Their stats (with ur method) are better than some of the others on this list.

S. Pollock (94.04) - not a true openning bowler
I. Khan (didn't get 200 wickets)

What do you mean Imran didn't get 200 wickets???

Imran Career bowling stats: 88 matches 362 wickets 8/58(best inning figures) 14/116(best match figures) 22.81(average) 2.54(r.p.o) 53.7(strike rate) 23(5 wickets in an innings) 6(10 wickets in a match)

Shaun Pollock - not a true opening bowler???

Shaun Pollock bowling stats: 63 matches 261 wickets 7/87(best inning figures) 10/147(best match figures) 20.72(average) 2.29(r.p.o) 54.1(strike rate) 14(5 wickets in an inning) 1(10 wickets in a match).

Both of these guys have exceptional career stats. Your excuses for not including them are the lamest I have heard.

 

[Paid The Umpire]

Sorry, about Khan.

Well the reason I assumed that he got less than 200 wickets is that....

The list I used to get the players stats was made by my father and I guess he left him off it accidently.

SORRY!

Pollock - I just don't like him , kidding, I just looked at the others in the list and I rated Pollock as the 'worst' of the best. After all it is my POLL!

I cry myself to sleep after that abuse!

 

[royGilchrist]

I cry myself to sleep after that abuse!

hahaha! Not a big deal Paid, u got most of them right anyways, and everyone makes mistakes.

This poll still rules

 

[Gotchya]

Sorry, about Khan.

Well the reason I assumed that he got less than 200 wickets is that....

The list I used to get the players stats was made by my father and I guess he left him off it accidently.

SORRY!

Pollock - I just don't like him , kidding, I just looked at the others in the list and I rated Pollock as the 'worst' of the best. After all it is my POLL!

I cry myself to sleep after that abuse!

Sure mate its ur poll and yes mistakes are always acceptable

 

[Gotchya]

Oh and another thing, please stop that immunity thing will ya ? :saint: