And comparing a massive innings in a five day test match with a massive innings in a 50 over game is a sign of great intellect !!psxpro said:You guys all seem dumb.
SJS said:And comparing a massive innings in a five day test match with a massive innings in a 50 over game is a sign of great intellect !!
I agree with 50% of what you saypsxpro said:WHy? Its a good comparision, different type of innings but he was asking which was better and I say the 50 over one.
I don't have great intellect, but most of replies on this thread have been dumb, so I must be dumb and all you guys dumber or dumbest.
One guy made 400. The other made 194, of which more than 100 were made with the help of a runner. Doesnt take Holmes to figure out which was better.psxpro said:WHy? Its a good comparision, different type of innings but he was asking which was better and I say the 50 over one.
I don't have great intellect, but most of replies on this thread have been dumb, so I must be dumb and all you guys dumber or dumbest.
Deja moo said:One guy made 400. The other made 194, of which more than 100 were made with the help of a runner. Doesnt take Holmes to figure out which was better.
And there is only one post in this entire thread that talks of India and Pakistan (out of the blue), shows who is conditioned to think on these lines.Deja moo said:I dont care if you accuse me of bias or whatever.... the fact is he made half the runs with a runner.
Um, no.redbaron said:Lol, all u coward indians are ganging up on the guy who started this thread just cos he is pakistani.
But that would be untrue. I'm glad he's West Indian. It should be "could care less, but don't at the moment".Dasa said:That would be "couldn't care less."
some good points there ,it kinda shows how much that innings by anwar hurt some pplredbaron said:Lol, all u coward indians are ganging up on the guy who started this thread just cos he is pakistani. im sure when sehwag gets the first ODI 200 its gonna be better then laras 375 and 400 put together. why post one line tripes not even talking about anwar or lara, instead taking the mickey out of the poster, eg. 'give the kid what he wants'. lol u guys are idiots, u dont have to insult him to get ure point across.
id have to say i enjoyed laras innigns better, although i have aslo seen anwars. having a runner doesnt make it any less better, he still kept his concentration throughout 45 or something overs to thrash the indian bowlers around. theres only one part of anwars innings superior to laras, 3 sixes off one kumble over.
and no i am not pakistani or indian ,, but infact australian.
You don't get endless time to score runs in a Test either! That was years ago.psxpro said:The 194 was in a odi. No one can score 400 in an odi, you don't get endless time to score it.
it may have been made with a runner but the umpires allowed it, so what, he made the runs.
One of them was in a dead test match where the series was already lost.
I saw it i was there, my claim to fameMr Mxyzptlk said:You are ridiculous. I could care less if Brian Lara is a West Indian. The innings was epic and I'm certain you did not see it.