Yes, it's much easier on the conscience to believe that these terrorists are just running around killing as many people as they can, purely because they "hate freedom" etc. and all the other 'bollocks' the media would have you believe, isnt it? It's much more difficult to accept that these attacks were well planned and carried out with absolute precision and that they KNEW exactly what they were doing and did it deliberately, isn't it?I can't believe you'd be that blind to think that terroists wouldn't attack a team even if they don't hold a grudge against them.
New Zealand have sided with the USA in political terms, so attempting to take out the NZ cricket team would be a nice little reminder of who your friends are.
If Australia had been held up in Pakistan by the bomb blasts then this whole scenario would be no different.
Now we're entering into a new phase of terroism, its not just about selection anymore..its about how many you can kill in one area.
Tell me one occasion where the NZ cricket team or any other cricket team for that matter was targetted by terrorists.That being said ofcourse no one can tell what's in store in the future.But that doesn't mean anybody stops working and for the cricketers its a profession.No one is asking them to go to a place where a clear and present danger is lurking and people are getting killed in the streets everyday.Nairobi is a city where people live peacefully and it has its share of crimes etc. that every other city has.And if anything can happen there, then it can happen anywhere else, can't it ?Tim said:I can't believe you'd be that blind to think that terroists wouldn't attack a team even if they don't hold a grudge against them.
Well we have had this discussion at length I believe in the "Off topic" section sometime ago, and this ain't the right forum to kickstart it again....but for the record, IMO that's a lot of bunkum.Top_Cat said:But no, the moral point was made by hitting and destroying the US's symbol of capitalist strength (the WTC) and the nerve centre of their intelligence (the Pentagon). This point will outlive most of the other hype, moreso than if they'd just killed a whole lot of people, in my opinion.
Don't you think all of those were cases of being in the wrong place at the wrong time ? And can't that happen anywhere in the world to anybody and not only the NZ players ?Tim said:I still don't think it matters whether NZ were targeted or not, they were still involved in a terroist act on 3 occassions & I can't blame them for taking Government advice.
And what's that supposed to mean ? Are you suggesting that NZ only tour English speaking countries 'coz the others where some "strange" language is spoken, you never really know what they are conspiring behind you ?.... you better explain what you meant, pal. And I thought you were an admin in this forum and would have known better before uttering such inflammatory statements.Tim said:To be honest, to be stranded in a foreign country where little english is spoken would be quite frightening and how you don't know whats going to happen next.
And what do YOU think a Jihad really means? I can tell you it ain't got anything to do with warring on another country/government/religion explicitely. Usama sure draws a long bow when he uses the term and realistically speaking, for him to call himself a Muslim and use the terms like Jihad as he has is at best insulting to followers of Islam and at worst, blasphemous to his own religion.And what did you think 'jihad' meant Top_Cat?..all along he Osama said he wanted to bring war on America.
You didn't say that, but when you make ambiguous statements, people will ask the question.When did i ever say that NZ should only tour English speaking countries, how ridiculous is that? Stop mixing words.
Because your statement there seems to suggest that in a non-English speaking country you don't really know if others are conspiring against you by speaking in their own language.It suggests that you cannot trust anybody who does not talk your language.Tim said:Why do you think it is such an inflammatory statement?
Lets not read between the lines.
Tim said:When did i ever say that NZ should only tour English speaking countries, how ridiculous is that? Stop mixing words.
Oh yeah I surely would tone it down...but some things just get to me.Top_Cat said:You didn't say that, but when you make ambiguous statements, people will ask the question.
That said, aussie_beater, I think we'd BOTH better tone it down a little, mate.
That's okay. We all have our buttons to push. Good on ya, mate.Oh yeah I surely would tone it down...but some things just get to me.
We surely won't let that sort of thing happen here :P ...and it never degenerates to that kinda level in this forum ever.Top_Cat said:One particular user got the board shut down by the FBI after he threatened the life of the President (a federal crime) in a topic. Someone at AR15.com saw it, complained and they mounted a campaign to get the site shut-down. Closing the forum then happened.
A guy I know came back from a safari trip to Kenya just a couple of months ago with his family and kids.He was saying that its a beautiful country with very nice people.And in his opinion its its the best place on earth for wildlife enthusiasts.Top_Cat said:Check this out! More info on Kenya:
http://213.131.178.162/Nations/Africa/Kenya/default.asp
Religion: Protestant 40 per cent, Roman Catholic 30 per cent, Indigenous beliefs 22 per cent, Muslim 6 per cent, Other 2 per cent. The majority of Kenyans are Christian. About 40 per cent belong to various Protestant churches and 30 per cent are Roman Catholic. Approximately 6 per cent are Muslim. Most Muslims live along the coast and in the North East. About 10 per cent of the people follow indigenous belief systems or non-traditional Christian beliefs.
Geez, they're more a Christian country than Australia is!
You can be SURE it won't happen on my bloomin' watch...........We surely won't let that sort of thing happen here ...and it never degenerates to that kinda level in this forum ever.