Behind both, but close to Hall. On quality might be better, but don't have the career for thatHow does Adcock stack up to these two
fair enough on Statham, he was averaging 23 about 62 tests in and had a respectable record against Australia and West Indies. Hall though, Adcock has 71 @ 22 against Australia/England while Hall has 110 @ 32.Behind both, but close to Hall. On quality might be better, but don't have the career for that
Adcock and Hall had almost as drastically different home conditions as well. IIRC, in matches he played the bowling average was something akin to 25.fair enough on Statham, he was averaging 23 about 62 tests in and had a respectable record against Australia and West Indies. Hall though, Adcock has 71 @ 22 against Australia/England while Hall has 110 @ 32.
I feel like Adcock is better
tbf, the only place they both toured was England and Adcock averaged 23.36, had 4 WPM and took 2 5fers in 9 games while Hall had 34 wkts @ 32, no 5 fer and only 3.4 WPMAdcock and Hall had almost as drastically different home conditions as well. IIRC, in matches he played the bowling average was something akin to 25.
other notable bowlers of the erafair enough on Statham, he was averaging 23 about 62 tests in and had a respectable record against Australia and West Indies. Hall though, Adcock has 71 @ 22 against Australia/England while Hall has 110 @ 32.
I feel like Adcock is better
Not sure. I will have a look today. Hall had to bowl on a lot of flat tracks@BazBall21 any thoughts on Adcock vs Statham vs Hall?
Yeah that's trueNot sure. I will have a look today. Hall had to bowl on a lot of flat tracks