• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Weekes v Barrington v Viv Richards (rank in order)

Rank in order as greater Test batsmen

  • Weekes > Barrington > V. Richards

  • Weekes > V. Richards > Barrington

  • Barrington > Weekes > V. Richards

  • V. Richards > Weekes > Barrington

  • Barrington > V. Richards > Weekes

  • V. Richards > Barrington > Weekes


Results are only viewable after voting.

DrWolverine

International Vice-Captain
Ken Barrington had great tours.

In WI : 5 Tests. 420 runs @ 47.
In Aus : 5 Tests. 464 runs @ 66.
In Aus : 5 Tests. 582 runs @ 73.
In NZ : 3 Tests. 294 runs @ 73.
In Pak : 2 Tests. 229 runs @ 77.
In Ind : 5 Tests. 594 runs @ 99.
In SA : 5 Tests. 504 runs @ 101.
Scored 500+ runs at home @ 76 vs Aus

Yes he lacked the longevity of other great batsmen and his batting was very defensive but he had an almost perfect record.
 

Johan

International Coach
I think they are both fine players (and from everyting I understand fine people) whose averages flatter them, and are just out of that tier A elite group of batters because of length of career, unique accomplishments etc. I think Barrington had fewer soft runs than Weekes.
I generally think Weekes is the type of batsman you'd like way more tbh, Barrington being the stereotypical slow English plodder similar to Geoffrey Boycott, to Weekes being an all commanding stroke maker compared to the likes of Trumper and McCabe in his range and timing.
 

Johan

International Coach
Who do you think is more boring to watch? Geoff Boycott or Ken Barrington?
Barrington was definitely more pleasant to watch, Boycott would be even more dour to watch.

In the 1950s, when Barrington was a young Surrey Batsman, he was actually a dashing strokemaker, likened to Denis Compton by many but his natural game just didn't get success, at 27-28 Years old, Barrington was barely averaging 30 odd in First Class Cricket despite having all the shots in his arsenal, and he was not even considered for the English national team, that is when he transformed and re-invented his batting style to be way more defensive, which wasn't his choice, he was asked to do so by Peter May and Sir Alec Bedser, and in just one season, his fortunes changed, 30 became 50. He would still have shades of his older self, would often launch the ball for a six to make a hundred and play strokes when got the chance.

Boycott was a defensive batsman from moment one, He neglected his own talents and skills, he thought it was his job to see the shine off the ball, when Tom Graveney heard that Boycott thought of his role as so little, he found it absurd that someone of Boycott's capability thought he just had to take the shine off the ball. Graveney thought a Boycott who let himself go would be up there with the immortals but that was to never materalise, that's not to say Boycott didn't attack when he could but he never even entertained the thought of being a strokemaker for large amounts of time, He would never have a party trick that involved a six to bring up a century.

Personal opinion is that Boycott and Barrington were both pretty similar, in quality and in style, neither had the self belief to really be an all time great and both didn't have the same sense of self great batsmen generally have, both were defensive, both were dropped in their careers atleast once for playing too slow, Barrington had a better average but Boycott achieved a much longer career and had more marquee performances at home and away from home, Barrington was a genuinely good person and was loved by everyone around him but was always internally battling with depression and anxiety, Boycott is not a very good person and was hated by everyone but ended up living a happier life, one thing their personalities shared was their iron will, both were fighters and never gave in. Both of them have similarities in a lot of things, and contrast at certain points as well.
 
Last edited:

Top