is he better than Weekes for you?Falls just short for me... Dravid/Sanga/Barrington are the worst batters I have as ATGs
Slightly above him yesis he better than Weekes for you?
Nah he had one terrible series in West Indies, he was actually pretty respectable in his last two Ashes, 2 hundreds against Trueman and Statham and a great performance in Trueman's game.Borderline ATG.
His first 2 years were absolute Bradmanesque and Final three became Bothamesque!
He somehow filled the void after Bradman’s retirement till Chappel debuted.
Probably the strongest argument for him being an ATG.Lad was also pretty much handsome
Weekes WAG WAG.Probably, but I'll say no due to you lot's slander of Weekes.
Time for a “Is Hayden an ATG thread?”Probably, but I'll say no due to you lots slander of Weekes.
He's in the ICC Hall of Fame now, so I think the case is closed.Time for a “Is Hayden an ATG thread?”
It depends upon the quantum you include in ATG.Probably the strongest argument for him being an ATG.
I don't think "ATG" should depend on how many people are ahead of him, but rather on the criteria you set.It depends upon the quantum you include in ATG.
For me in Test Cricket’s 148 year history of having 3,892 Cricketers top 30 with the bat fits in an ATG category.
yeah, but the criteria I set is something not too herculean enough to be included just in top 10…I don't think "ATG" should depend on how many people are ahead of him, but rather on the criteria you set.
Yup, ATGs should keep increasing as time goes on imoI don't think "ATG" should depend on how many people are ahead of him, but rather on the criteria you set.
Fair.yeah, but the criteria I set is something not too herculean enough to be included just in top 10…