subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Who is the greater cricketer?
Lol you were the guy who used to dismiss spinners as second rateView attachment 47306
Only two specialist bats above Shane Warne, Viv and Sachin are not one of them
never Warne.Lol you were the guy who used to dismiss spinners as second rate
Be real, you rate at least 6/7 pacers ahead of him.never Warne.
MarshallBe real, you rate at least 6/7 pacers ahead of him.
Bother to explain how this statement makes sense?Marshall
McGrath
Barnes
Hadlee
Ambrose
Steyn
Warne
Muralidharan
Tiger
so Six.
Only two specialist bats above Shane Warne, Viv and Sachin are not one of them
I'd take Ambrose/Steyn/Hadlee/Barnes above any bat except Bradman and Hobbs, McGrath vs Hobbs is a tie, Marshall beats Hobbs but still loses to The Don obviously.Bother to explain how this statement makes sense?
Yeah that's a serious overrating of bowlers IMO.I'd take Ambrose/Steyn/Hadlee/Barnes above any bat except Bradman and Hobbs, McGrath vs Hobbs is a tie, Marshall beats Hobbs but still loses to The Don obviously.
on this topic atleast, Murali already beat Viv, I don't know why Warne wouldn't.Yeah that's a serious overrating of bowlers IMO.
didn't you vote Warne's rival over Viv?
Yes. Warne more limited.Warne obviously had a huge match-winning threshold due to not only his skill but his capacity to bowl for so long but Viv was better v great bowlers than Warne was v great batsmen.
Richards.11 Warnes vs 11 Richardss, who wins?
Warne could score his first ton11 Warnes vs 11 Richardss, who wins?
Massively underrating bowler impact, for mine.Yeah that's a serious overrating of bowlers IMO.
I assume you have just Bradman,bowlers and ARs in your top ten then?Massively underrating bowler impact, for mine.
Edit: Which is why I tend to hate these comparisons, personally.