• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Shubhash Gupte and Abdul Qadir vs Shane Warne

Qadir and Gupte vs Warne


  • Total voters
    9

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Proof by contradiction doesn't need any basis tho. There is no basis in assuming that square root of 2 is rational, but we still do it, and then disprove our assumption by coming up with a contradiction.
Again, by this logic I'd have to explain why Indians play spin better than Americans because someone just said Americans play it better without explaining their reasoning for that statement
 

govinda indian fan

International Debutant
No they didn't, even their great bats like Dravid and Sehwag were often non factors to good HTD pace, Azharrudin/Sidhu type were awful to pace, even VVS and Virat had a huge problem with vertical movement, it's only Gavaskar/Amarnath/Sachin who stand out against fast bowling.
True.hb point that england were **** vs spin is false same way indians were **** vs pace. Both teams have their weekness but not bad as zim or ban
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
I've looked into the Murali vs Warne debate quite a lot as well, and I've finally changed my opinion on the same. Murali > Warne for me now.
Yeah this to me seems like one of the few places on the internet or in general where Murali wins that.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Spinners vs 90’s England 106 tests 397 @ 33.40
Spinners vs 00’s Bangladesh 61 tests 414 @ 19.92
 

Top