• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Rank them as test batsman in order.

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
for me, Rohit vs QDK largely comes down to how they did in England, bit of a bias there but Rohit was excellent in 2021 while I never felt QDK was comfortable in England.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
I reckon Stokes is better than QDK, the latter has a very small career, 2014-2021 and averages only 3 points more than Stokes too, Stokes in his best 7-8 year run averages the same and obviously has greater knocks and performances.
 

Thala_0710

International Vice-Captain
The bottom 3 are tough to rank for me, Rohit's series in Eng as an opener + some great knocks on rank turners in India pushed him to 4th for me. Stokes vs De Kock is basically a coin toss for me, De Kock slightly more consistent imo on tougher tracks (especially at home), but Stokes has more longevity and ATG performances.
Can be convinced either way here, but went for De Kock
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
On Pant vs Head, Head has one overseas hundred in 52 digs, Pant has six overseas hundreds in 60. Pant has 4 hundreds in England, Head has 1 hundred in England and even that against not the home team, Pant in Australia is amazing as we all know, Pant made THAT hundred at Newlands while Head averages in 20s outside the big three. Pant has played 13 home games and 33 away games, Head has played 32 home gomes and 28 away games, Pant averages 55 at home and Head 51, the fact their average is identical with that, tells me Pant is better
 

Thala_0710

International Vice-Captain
On Pant vs Head, Head has one overseas hundred in 52 digs, Pant has six overseas hundreds in 60. Pant has 4 hundreds in England, Head has 1 hundred in England and even that against not the home team, Pant in Australia is amazing as we all know, Pant made THAT hundred at Newlands while Head averages in 20s outside the big three. Pant has played 13 home games and 33 away games, Head has played 32 home gomes and 28 away games, Pant averages 55 at home and Head 51, the fact their average is identical with that, tells me Pant is better
Good points, I'm going to change to Pant over Head as well.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
On Pant vs Head, Head has one overseas hundred in 52 digs, Pant has six overseas hundreds in 60. Pant has 4 hundreds in England, Head has 1 hundred in England and even that against not the home team, Pant in Australia is amazing as we all know, Pant made THAT hundred at Newlands while Head averages in 20s outside the big three. Pant has played 13 home games and 33 away games, Head has played 32 home gomes and 28 away games, Pant averages 55 at home and Head 51, the fact their average is identical with that, tells me Pant is better
To be honest Head's 50s in the Windies were worth 150s though.
 

Top